Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30653575›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Wishes to die at the end of life and subjective experience of four different typical dying trajectories. A qualitative interview study.

Kathrin Ohnsorge, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Nina Streeck, Heike Gudat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frailty in Critical Care Medicine: A Review.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathrin OhnsorgeHospiz im Park, Hospital for Palliative Care, Arlesheim, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7688-2770
Christoph Rehmann-SutterInstitute for History of Medicine and Science Studies, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7642-5556
Nina StreeckInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Heike GudatHospiz im Park, Hospital for Palliative Care, Arlesheim, Switzerland.
Hospiz im Park · CHUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RESEARCH

aimsThe motivations that lead to wishes to die (WTD) in palliative care patients with cancer are relatively well studied. But little is known about WTD in other pathologies and the relation between subjective understandings of dying trajectories and a WTD. We investigated the WTD of palliative patients in four different dying trajectories: neurological diseases, organ failure, frailty due to age, and cancer. STUDY POPULATION: 62 palliative cancer (n = 30) and non-cancer (n = 32) patients (10 neurological disease; 11 organ failure; 11 frailty), their families and health professionals in different palliative care settings (248 interviews). STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsQualitative semi-structured interviews. Data analysis through Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis and Grounded Theory.

resultsIn addition to personal motivations, we found that people dealing with similar trajectories were often confronted with similar questions and concerns due to similar challenges. For four trajectories we show typical patterns, similarities and differences that should be considered when talking with patients about their WTD. These illness-related considerations do not explain the WTD completely, but give important information on the challenges for particular patient groups that might experience a WTD. In all patient groups, there were clear moments that triggered a WTD: for neurological patients it was experiencing breathlessness, high-dependency care, or when considering tube feeding or respiratory support; for persons with organ failure it was an acute burdensome crisis; for patients with cancer after the initial diagnosis, it was the first relapse or the move into advanced palliative care; for elderly frail persons it was the move into care facilities, or the loss of important relationships or capabilities. The feeling of being a burden to others was reported in all patient groups.

interpretationWTD can be triggered within disease trajectories by specific conditions and transitional points that affect agency and self-understanding. A better understanding of the concerns and challenges of a particular dying trajectory as well as its characteristic trigger points can facilitate early and comprehensive communication about patients' WTD, and the underlying motivations and protective factors.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCommunicationFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansInterpersonal RelationsInterview, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNeoplasmsNervous System Diseases

Identifiers

PMID30653575
PMCPMC6336242
OpenAlexW2910832552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.