Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30653559›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Molecular features of premenopausal breast cancers in Latin American women: Pilot results from the PRECAMA study.

Magali Olivier, Liacine Bouaoun, Stephanie Villar, Alexis Robitaille, Vincent Cahais, Adriana Heguy, Graham Byrnes, Florence Le Calvez-Kelm, Gabriela Torres-Mejía, Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A predictive model for neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison ofJCO precision oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Magali OlivierSection of Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8202-342X
Liacine BouaounSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Stephanie VillarSection of Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Alexis RobitailleSection of Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Vincent CahaisSection of Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Adriana HeguyDepartment of Pathology and Genome Technology Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, United States of America.
Graham ByrnesSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Florence Le Calvez-KelmGenetic Cancer Susceptibility Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Gabriela Torres-MejíaCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Isabel Alvarado-CabreroDepartment of Pathology, Hospital de Oncología, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4000-9280
Fazlollah Shahram Imani-RazaviDepartment of Pathology, UMAE Hospital de Gineco Obstetricia No. 4 "Luis Castelazo Ayala", Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.
Gloria Inés SánchezGroup Infection and Cancer, School of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Roberto JaramilloHemato Oncologos, Cali, Colombia.
Carolina PorrasAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas (ACIB)-Fundación INCIENSA, Costa Rica.
Ana Cecilia RodriguezAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas (ACIB)-Fundación INCIENSA, Costa Rica.
Maria Luisa GarmendiaInstituto de Nutrición y de Tecnología de los Alimentos, Santiago, Chile.
José Luis SotoNational Institute of Cancer, Santiago, Chile.
Isabelle RomieuSection of Nutrition and Metabolism, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Peggy PorterDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States of America.
Jamie GuenthoerDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States of America.
Sabina RinaldiSection of Nutrition and Metabolism, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
PRECAMA team
Centre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRFred Hutch Cancer Center · USInstituto Costarricense de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud · CRMexican Social Security Institute · MXInstituto Nacional del Cáncer · CLInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXNYU Langone Health · USUniversidad de Antioquia · CO

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Latin America (LA), there is a high incidence rate of breast cancer (BC) in premenopausal women, and the genomic features of these BC remain unknown. Here, we aim to characterize the molecular features of BC in young LA women within the framework of the PRECAMA study, a multicenter population-based case-control study of BC in premenopausal women.

methodsPathological tumor tissues were collected from incident cases from four LA countries. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed centrally for ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, EGFR, CK5/6, and p53 protein markers. Targeted deep sequencing was done on genomic DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues and their paired blood samples to screen for somatic mutations in eight genes frequently mutated in BC. A subset of samples was analyzed by exome sequencing to identify somatic mutational signatures.

resultsThe majority of cases were positive for ER or PR (168/233; 72%), and 21% were triple-negative (TN), mainly of basal type. Most tumors were positive for Ki67 (189/233; 81%). In 126 sequenced cases, TP53 and PIK3CA were the most frequently mutated genes (32.5% and 21.4%, respectively), followed by AKT1 (9.5%). TP53 mutations were more frequent in HER2-enriched and TN IHC subtypes, whereas PIK3CA/AKT1 mutations were more frequent in ER-positive tumors, as expected. Interestingly, a higher proportion of G:C>T:A mutations was observed in TP53 in PRECAMA cases compared with TCGA and METABRIC BC series (27% vs 14%). Exome-wide mutational patterns in 10 TN cases revealed alterations in signal transduction pathways and major contributions of mutational signatures caused by altered DNA repair pathways.

conclusionsThese pilot results on PRECAMA tumors give a preview of the molecular features of premenopausal BC in LA. Although the overall mutation burden was as expected from data in other populations, mutational patterns observed in TP53 and exome-wide suggested possible differences in mutagenic processes giving rise to these tumors compared with other populations. Further -omics analyses of a larger number of cases in the near future will enable the investigation of relationships between these molecular features and risk factors.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesExome SequencingFemaleGenes, p53High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryIncidenceLatin AmericaMiddle AgedMutationPilot ProjectsPremenopauseBiomarkers, TumorTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID30653559
PMCPMC6336331
OpenAlexW2950043712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.