Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30653548›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Incidence of transient interruption of contrast (TIC) - A retrospective single-centre analysis in CT pulmonary angiography exams acquired during inspiratory breath-hold with the breathing command: "Please inspire gently!"

Sonja Sudarski, Holger Haubenreisser, Thomas Henzler, Carolin Reischauer, Orpheus Kolokythas, Simon Matoori, Bernhard A Herzog, Stefan O Schönberg, Andreas Gutzeit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sonja SudarskiInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1295-6443
Holger HaubenreisserInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Thomas HenzlerInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Carolin ReischauerInstitute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Research Unit, Hirslanden Hospital St. Anna, Luzern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6624-6615
Orpheus KolokythasDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Simon MatooriInstitute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Research Unit, Hirslanden Hospital St. Anna, Luzern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1559-0950
Bernhard A HerzogHerzClinic Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland.
Stefan O SchönbergInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Andreas GutzeitInstitute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Research Unit, Hirslanden Hospital St. Anna, Luzern, Switzerland.
Heidelberg University · DEETH Zurich · CHHirslanden Klinik St. Anna · CHParacelsus Medical University · ATUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the occurrence of transient interruption of contrast (TIC) phenomenon in pulmonary computed tomography angiography (CTPA) exams performed in inspiratory breath-hold after patients were told to inspire gently.

methodsIn this retrospective single-centre study, CTPA exams of 225 consecutive patients scanned on a 16-slice CT scanner system were analysed. A-priori to measurements, exams were screened for inadequate pulmonary artery contrast due to incorrect bolus tracking or failure of i.v. contrast administration. Those exams were excluded. Attenuation values in the thoracic aorta and in the pulmonary trunk were assessed in duplicate measurements (M1 and M2) and the aorto-pulmonary density ratio was calculated. An aorto-pulmonary ratio > 1 with still contrast inflow being visible within the superior vena cava was defined as TIC.

results3 patients were excluded due to incorrect bolus tracking. Final analysis was performed in 222 patients (mean age 65 ± 19 years, range 18 to 99 years). Mean density in the pulmonary trunk was 275±17 HU, in the aorta 208 ± 15 HU. Mean aorto-pulmonary ratio was 0.81± 0.29. 48 patients (21.6%) had an aorto-pulmonary ratio >1. Correlation of mean aorto-pulmonary ratio and age was: -0.213 (p = 0.001). Age was not significantly different for an aorto-pulmonary ratio >1 vs. ≤1 (p = 0.122). Both in M1 and M2, 33/222 patients presented with absolute HU values of < 200 HU within the pulmonary artery. In M1 measurements, 24 of these 33 patients (72%) fulfilled TIC criteria (M2: 25/33 patients (75%)).

conclusionsTIC is a common phenomenon in CTPA studies with inspiratory breath-hold commands after patients were told to inspire gently with an incidence of 22% in our retrospective cohort. Occurrence of TIC shows a significant negative correlation with increasing age and disproportionately often occurs in patients with lower absolute contrast density values within their pulmonary arteries.

Indexed as

Breath HoldingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComputed Tomography AngiographyContrast MediaFemaleHumansIncidenceInhalationMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary ArteryPulmonary EmbolismRetrospective StudiesContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID30653548
PMCPMC6336366
OpenAlexW2909692999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.