Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30653348›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2019

Decisional Balance and Contemplation Ladder to Support Interventions for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake and Persistence.

Steven A John, H Jonathon Rendina, Tyrel J Starks, Christian Grov, Jeffrey T Parsons

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steven A John1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
H Jonathon Rendina2 Department of Psychology, Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies & Training, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), New York, New York.
Tyrel J Starks2 Department of Psychology, Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies & Training, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), New York, New York.
Christian Grov4 Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, The CUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, New York, New York.
Jeffrey T Parsons2 Department of Psychology, Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies & Training, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), New York, New York.
Hunter College · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

QUANTITATIVE COREP30MH052776 · NIMH · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI KELLY, JEFFREY A · 1994 to 2018
$33.2M
Syndemics and resilience for HIV transmission in a national sample of vulnerableR01DA036466 · NIDA · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI GROV, CHRISTIAN, RENDINA, H. JONATHON · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Developing a mobile emotion regulation intervention for HIV-positive menK01DA039030 · NIDA · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI RENDINA, H. JONATHON · 2015 to 2018
$743k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA039030NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036466NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH052776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fewer than 60,000 males-inclusive of all sexual identities-were prescribed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by mid-2017 in the United States. Efforts to increase PrEP uptake among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM), in particular, are ongoing in research and practice settings, but few tools exist to support interventions. We aimed to develop and validate tools to support motivational interviewing interventions for PrEP. In 2017, a national sample of HIV-negative GBM of relatively high socioeconomic status (n = 786) was asked about sexual behaviors that encompass Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for PrEP use, a 35-item decisional-balance scale (i.e., PrEP-DB) assessing benefits and consequences of PrEP use, and questions assessing location on the motivational PrEP cascade and derivative-the PrEP contemplation ladder. Principal axis factoring with oblique promax rotation was used for PrEP-DB construct identification and item reduction. The final 20-item PrEP-DB performed well; eigenvalues indicating a 4-factor solution provided an adequate fit to the data. Factors included the following: health benefits (α = 0.91), health consequences (α = 0.82), social benefits (α = 0.72), and social consequences (α = 0.86). Ladder scores increased across the cascade (ρ = 0.89, p < 0.001), and health benefits (β = 0.50, p < 0.001) and health consequences (β = -0.37, p < 0.001) were more strongly associated with ladder location than social benefits (β = 0.05, p > 0.05) and social consequences (β = -0.05, p > 0.05) in the fully adjusted regression model. The PrEP-DB demonstrated good reliability and predictive validity, and the ladder had strong construct validity with the motivational PrEP cascade. PrEP uptake and persistence interventions and additional empirical work could benefit from the utility of these measures.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBisexualityHIV InfectionsHIV SeronegativityHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationMotivational InterviewingPre-Exposure ProphylaxisReproducibility of ResultsSafe SexHIVmen who have sex with menmotivational interviewingpre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID30653348
PMCPMC6386084
OpenAlexW2909256710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.