Observational studyMedicine2019
Relaxed skin tension line-oriented keystone-designed perforator island flaps considering the facial aesthetic unit concept for the coverage of small to moderate facial defects.
Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective Analysis of 50 Hemi-Keystone Flap Head and Neck Reconstructions with Scar Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Patient and Observer Scar Assessment of Facial Keystone Flap Reconstruction in Korean Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Uneasy (Intractable) Head and Neck Defect Coverage With Easy and Reliable Local Flap Techniques: A Retrospective Case-Based Study of Perforator-Plus Peninsular Flap and Modified Keystone Flap.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- The Keystone Perforator Island Flap: Review of Utility and Versatile Clinical Applications.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Locoregional Flaps for the Reconstruction of Midface Skin Defects: A Collection of Key Surgical Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Versatility of Naso-labial Flap in Reconstruction of Facial Defects.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2023Article
- Modified Mini-Keystone Flaps for Coverage of Tiny Volar Pulp Defects of the Fingertips in Cases with Missing Amputation Skin Stumps: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A comparative study for tension-reducing effect of Type I and Type II keystone perforator island flap in the human back.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Full-Thickness Skin Graft according to Surrounding Relaxed Skin Tension Line Improves Scar Quality in Facial Defect Coverage: A Retrospective Comparative Study.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Keystone design perforator island flap in facial defect reconstruction.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Review
- Article
- Circumferential penile defect reconstruction with pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps: A case report.Medicine · 2020Article
- Keystone-design perforator island flaps for the management of complicated epidermoid cysts on the back.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Utility of Keystone Flap in Armory of Dermatosurgeons.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A variety of reconstructive options including skin grafts, loco-regional flaps, and free flaps exist for the coverage of facial defects. Each technique has advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we present our experience with relaxed skin tension line (RSTL)-oriented, keystone-designed perforator island flap (KDPIF) reconstructions, in consideration of the facial aesthetic unit concept for coverage of small to moderate facial defects.Between May 2016 and February 2018, 17 patients (11 men and 6 women), with an average age of 63.53 years (range: 37-83 years) underwent KDPIF reconstructions to cover facial defects. We performed the KDPIF reconstructions in consideration of the RSTLs and facial aesthetic unit concept. We retrospectively reviewed the defect causes, locations, and sizes, and flap sizes, types, and survivals, as well as the complications. Cosmetic outcomes were evaluated using the Harris 4-stage scale from 3 independent plastic surgeons' point of view, and postoperative satisfactory surveys from all patients.All defects were successfully covered with KDPIF. The defect sizes varied from 1.5 × 1.5 cm to 3 × 3.5 cm. The flap sizes varied from 1.5 × 3 cm to 3 × 5.5 cm. All flaps fully survived and there were no postoperative complications. The average subjective patient satisfaction score was 8.29 (range: 7-10) and the objective cosmetic outcomes were favorable (fair, good, or excellent).Considering its simplicity and safety, the KDPIF is a good reconstruction option with few complications and high reproducibility. The RSTL-oriented KDPIF reconstruction is a good reconstructive option for covering small to moderate facial defects with superior aesthetic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.