Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30653161›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2019

Relaxed skin tension line-oriented keystone-designed perforator island flaps considering the facial aesthetic unit concept for the coverage of small to moderate facial defects.

Chi Sun Yoon, Hyo Bong Kim, Young Keun Kim, Hoon Kim, Kyu Nam Kim

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Versatility of Naso-labial Flap in Reconstruction of Facial Defects.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chi Sun YoonDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan.
Hyo Bong KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, University of Konyang College of Medicine, Myunggok Medical Research Center.
Young Keun KimKim Young Keun's Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery Clinics, Daejeon, Korea.
Hoon KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, University of Konyang College of Medicine, Myunggok Medical Research Center.
Kyu Nam KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, University of Konyang College of Medicine, Myunggok Medical Research Center.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of reconstructive options including skin grafts, loco-regional flaps, and free flaps exist for the coverage of facial defects. Each technique has advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we present our experience with relaxed skin tension line (RSTL)-oriented, keystone-designed perforator island flap (KDPIF) reconstructions, in consideration of the facial aesthetic unit concept for coverage of small to moderate facial defects.Between May 2016 and February 2018, 17 patients (11 men and 6 women), with an average age of 63.53 years (range: 37-83 years) underwent KDPIF reconstructions to cover facial defects. We performed the KDPIF reconstructions in consideration of the RSTLs and facial aesthetic unit concept. We retrospectively reviewed the defect causes, locations, and sizes, and flap sizes, types, and survivals, as well as the complications. Cosmetic outcomes were evaluated using the Harris 4-stage scale from 3 independent plastic surgeons' point of view, and postoperative satisfactory surveys from all patients.All defects were successfully covered with KDPIF. The defect sizes varied from 1.5 × 1.5 cm to 3 × 3.5 cm. The flap sizes varied from 1.5 × 3 cm to 3 × 5.5 cm. All flaps fully survived and there were no postoperative complications. The average subjective patient satisfaction score was 8.29 (range: 7-10) and the objective cosmetic outcomes were favorable (fair, good, or excellent).Considering its simplicity and safety, the KDPIF is a good reconstruction option with few complications and high reproducibility. The RSTL-oriented KDPIF reconstruction is a good reconstructive option for covering small to moderate facial defects with superior aesthetic outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEstheticsFaceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPerforator FlapPlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesSkin Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID30653161
PMCPMC6370060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.