ArticleMedicine2019
Population pharmacokinetics and individualized lobaplatin regimen for the treatment of Chinese small cell lung cancer in the elderly.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLobaplatin (LBP) is a third-generation platinum compound. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis prospective study was performed in 7 institutions in 2014-2016. Elderly small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients (≥65 years old) were divided into 2 groups to receive LBP regimens according to endogenous creatinine clearance rate (Ccr). LBP was administered at 30 and 20 mg/m in groups A (Ccr ≥ 80 ml/min) and B (60 ml/min ≤ Ccr < 80 ml/min), respectively. The primary endpoint was plasma LBP concentrations. Secondary endpoints were safety and efficacy parameters, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
resultsOne-hundred patients were enrolled. Median PFS and OS in groups A and B were 155 vs170 days and 306 vs 272 days, respectively. The rates of grade III/IV AEs in groups A and B were 60.8% (n = 31) and 51.0% (n = 25), respectively. In population pharmacokinetics, the area under the curve (AUC) value for group B was 39% lower than that of group A. With LBP administration based on body surface area (BSA), AUC differences between individuals were small.
conclusionWith Ccr ≥ 60 ml/min, BSA based administration is necessary. Meanwhile, LBP-based regimens are reliable in treating elderly patients with SCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.