Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30652605›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2018

PANOPLY: Omics-Guided Drug Prioritization Method Tailored to an Individual Patient.

Krishna R Kalari, Jason P Sinnwell, Kevin J Thompson, Xiaojia Tang, Erin E Carlson, Jia Yu, Peter T Vedell, James N Ingle, Richard M Weinshilboum, Judy C Boughey and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krishna R KalariAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jason P SinnwellAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Kevin J ThompsonAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Xiaojia TangAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Erin E CarlsonAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jia YuAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Peter T VedellAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
James N IngleAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Richard M WeinshilboumAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Judy C BougheyAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Liewei WangAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Matthew P GoetzAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Vera SumanAll authors: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
TRAININGU54GM114838 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HAN, JIAWEI, SINHA, SAURABH · 2014 to 2017
$10.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM114838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe majority of patients with cancer receive treatments that are minimally informed by omics data. We propose a precision medicine computational framework, PANOPLY (Precision Cancer Genomic Report: Single Sample Inventory), to identify and prioritize drug targets and cancer therapy regimens. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe PANOPLY approach integrates clinical data with germline and somatic features obtained from multiomics platforms and applies machine learning and network analysis approaches in the context of the individual patient and matched controls. The PANOPLY workflow uses the following four steps: selection of matched controls to the patient of interest; identification of patient-specific genomic events; identification of suitable drugs using the driver-gene network and random forest analyses; and provision of an integrated multiomics case report of the patient with prioritization of anticancer drugs.

resultsThe PANOPLY workflow can be executed on a stand-alone virtual machine and is also available for download as an R package. We applied the method to an institutional breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy study that collected clinical and genomic data as well as patient-derived xenografts to investigate the prioritization offered by PANOPLY. In a chemotherapy-resistant patient-derived xenograft model, we found that that the prioritized drug, olaparib, was more effective than placebo in treating the tumor ( P < .05). We also applied PANOPLY to in-house and publicly accessible multiomics tumor data sets with therapeutic response or survival data available.

conclusionPANOPLY shows promise as a means to prioritize drugs on the basis of clinical and multiomics data for an individual patient with cancer. Additional studies are needed to confirm this approach.

Indexed as

GenomicsPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMachine LearningNeoadjuvant TherapyPhthalazinesPiperazinesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazines

Identifiers

PMID30652605
PMCPMC7010444
OpenAlexW2950073687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.