ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2018
Pilot Study of Personalized Video Visit Summaries for Patients With Cancer.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding communication between patients and healthcare professionals regarding comprehensive biomarker testing in precision oncology: A scoping review.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Medico-Legal Implications of Video Recordings of Clinic Visits in Malpractice Claims Against Medical Providers.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe treatment of cancer is complex, which can overwhelm patients and lead to poor comprehension and recall of the specifics of the cancer stage, prognosis, and treatment plan. We hypothesized that an oncologist can feasibly record and deliver a custom video summary of the consultation that covers the diagnosis, recommended testing, treatment plan, and follow-up in < 5 minutes. The video summary allows the patient to review and share the most important part of a cancer consultation with family and caregivers.
methodsAt the conclusion of the office visit, oncologists recorded the most important points of the consultation, including the diagnosis and management plan as a short video summary. Patients were then e-mailed a link to a secure Website to view and share the video. Patients and invited guests were asked to respond to an optional survey of 15 multiple-choice and four open-ended questions after viewing the video online.
resultsThree physicians recorded and sent 58 video visit summaries to patients seen in multidisciplinary GI cancer clinics. Forty-one patients logged into the secure site, and 38 viewed their video. Fourteen patients shared their video and invited a total of 46 visitors, of whom 36 viewed the videos. Twenty-six patients completed the survey, with an average overall video satisfaction score of 9 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being most positive.
conclusionVideo visit summaries provide a personalized education tool that patients and caregivers find highly useful while navigating complex cancer care. We are exploring the incorporation of video visit summaries into the electronic medical record to enhance patient and caregiver understanding of their specific disease and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.