Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30652428›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2019

BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in Japanese women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Yan Liu, Yoshimi Ide, Mayuko Inuzuka, Sakiko Tazawa, Yoko Kanada, Yuki Matsunaga, Takashi Kuwayama, Terumasa Sawada, Sadako Akashi-Tanaka, Seigo Nakamura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cancers · 2025
    Article
  2. Prognostic implications of ductal carcinomaAnnals of surgical treatment and research · 2024
    Article
  3. The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Predicting the Likelihood of Carrying aJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Comprehensive study for BRCA1 and BRCA2 entire coding regions in breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yan LiuThe 3rd Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7547-8699
Yoshimi IdeDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mayuko InuzukaDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sakiko TazawaDepartment of Pathology, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoko KanadaDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki MatsunagaDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi KuwayamaDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Terumasa SawadaDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sadako Akashi-TanakaDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Seigo NakamuraThe 3rd Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Showa University · JPShowa University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuctal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a component of the clinical spectrum of breast cancer even in those with BRCA1/2 mutation. The aim of this study was to report the feature of DCIS raised in Japanese women with BRCA1/2 mutations.

methodsA total of 325 Japanese women with breast cancer (BC) (with or without invasive cancer) were referred for genetic counseling and underwent genetic testing for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Showa University Hospital between December 2011 and August 2016. And 49 of them who were pathologically diagnosed as DCIS were included in this study. Logistic regression models were fit to determine the associations between potential predictive factors and BRCA status. A Cox proportional hazards model is used to predictive value of parameters for Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and contralateral breast tumor recurrence (CBTR).

results(a) Of 325 patients (with or without invasive cancer), 19.1% (62/325) tested positive for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. And 18.4% (9/49) was positive for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in DCIS, compared with 19.2% (53/276) in IDC (p = 1.000). Among BRCA mutations, 14.5% (9/62) had DCIS compared with nonmutations (15.2%, 40/263). Incidence of DCIS was 3.0% (1/33) of BRCA1 mutations and 27.5% (8/29) of BRCA2 mutation (p = 0.009). (b) Median age of diagnosis in BRCA mutation carriers was 39 years, compared with 46 years in noncarriers. Age, Family history (FH) of BC, FH of first or second BC and total number of relatives with BC diagnosis (DX) has significant difference between BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers in univariate analysis. In a multivariate logistic model, total relatives with BC DX ≥ 2 (odds ratio [OR], 5.128; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.266-20.763; p = 0.022), age at diagnosis ≤35 years (OR 0.149, 95% CI 0.023-0.954, p = 0.045) and ER+/HER2+ status (OR 5.034, 95% CI 1.092-23.210, p = 0.038) remained as independent significant predictors for BRCA mutation. Ki67 index (cut off by 14% or 30%) did not differ between BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers (p = 0.459 and p = 0.651). (c) There was a significant difference in ER-positive tumors among BRCA2 carriers and noncarriers (p = 0.042). Subgroup analysis showed BRCA2 carriers tend to be of higher grade (Grade 2 and 3), more frequently ER+/PR+ (p = 0.041) and lower proliferation (Ki67 index) than noncarriers, whereas differences in nuclear grade and ki67 index were not found significantly in our study. (d) BRCA mutation was not associated with an increased risk of IBTR and CBTR.

conclusionDCIS is equally as prevalent in patients who were BRCA mutation carriers as in high familial-risk women who were noncarriers, but occurs at earlier age. BRCA2 carriers have higher incidence in DCIS than that of BRCA1 carriers, and tend to be higher grade and more frequently ER positive and lower proliferation. Total relatives with BC DX ≥2, age at diagnosis ≤35 years and ER+/HER2+ might be independent predictors for BRCA mutation in Japanese women with DCIS and patients of these risk factors should be recommended to receive genetic counseling and BRCA testing.

Indexed as

MutationAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleGenetic TestingHumansIncidenceJapanBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA 1/2 mutationsbreast cancerductal carcinoma in situfamily history

Identifiers

PMID30652428
PMCPMC6418441
OpenAlexW2908739593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.