ReviewJournal of cellular physiology2019
Efficacy and acceptability of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A network meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of cellular physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors in combination with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Pooled it
- A Canadian national guideline on the neoadjuvant treatment of invasive breast cancer, including patient assessment, systemic therapy, and local management principles.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Guideline
- Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with or without palbociclib in low-risk patients: a phase III randomized double-blind SAFIA trial.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Trial
- Article
- Super Magnetic Niosomal Nanocarrier as a New Approach for Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Case Study on SK-BR-3 and MDA-MB-231 Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: A potential strategy for ER-positive breast cancer.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal sequence of endocrine therapy in a neoadjuvant setting for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer is unclear. Our study evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for HR+ breast cancer.
methodsWe identified studies based on titles and abstracts that were published before 22 June 2018 in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials with at least one arm that evaluated the effectiveness of one or a combination of anastrozole, letrozole, palbociclib, tamoxifen, fulvestrant, abemaciclib, everolimus, gefitinib, ribociclib, taselisib, and exemestane. We pooled effect sizes using the odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% credibility interval (95% CrI). The primary outcomes were response rate and treatment completion.
resultsOur network meta-analysis included 3,306 participants and 16 eligible studies, which assessed 15 treatments. In terms of response rates, compared with letrozole combined therapy, tamoxifen was associated with a significant reduction in response rate (OR, 0.34; 95% CrI, 0.13-0.85; OR, 0.32; 95% CrI, 0.13-0.80; OR, 0.26; 95% CrI, 0.09-0.83; and OR, 0.30; 95% CrI, 0.09-0.96; for letrozole plus everolimus, letrozole plus taselisib, letrozole plus zoledronic acid, and letrozole plus lapatinib, respectively). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves ranking, letrozole plus zoledronic acid was associated with the highest rate of response (87.6%), followed by letrozole plus lapatinib (85.2%), and letrozole plus taselisib (79.3%).
conclusionsUltimately, our study established that letrozole plus zoledronic acid may be an optimal treatment based on its current rank in a neoadjuvant setting for HR+ breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.