Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30652204›Full record

ArticleNano convergence2019

Detection of cancer antigens (CA-125) using gold nano particles on interdigitated electrode-based microfluidic biosensor.

Bharath Babu Nunna, Debdyuti Mandal, Joo Un Lee, Harsimranjit Singh, Shiqiang Zhuang, Durgamadhab Misra, Md Nasir Uddin Bhuyian, Eon Soo Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano convergence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aptamer Nanomaterials for Ovarian Cancer Target Theranostics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bharath Babu NunnaAdvanced Energy Systems and Microdevices Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 200 Central Avenue, Rm MEC 327, Newark, NJ, 07102-1982, USA.
Debdyuti MandalAdvanced Energy Systems and Microdevices Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 200 Central Avenue, Rm MEC 327, Newark, NJ, 07102-1982, USA.
Joo Un LeeProvost Summer Research Intern at New Jersey Institute of Technology & Tenafly High School, Tenafly, NJ, USA.
Harsimranjit SinghAdvanced Energy Systems and Microdevices Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 200 Central Avenue, Rm MEC 327, Newark, NJ, 07102-1982, USA.
Shiqiang ZhuangAdvanced Energy Systems and Microdevices Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 200 Central Avenue, Rm MEC 327, Newark, NJ, 07102-1982, USA.
Durgamadhab MisraDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Md Nasir Uddin BhuyianDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Eon Soo LeeAdvanced Energy Systems and Microdevices Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 200 Central Avenue, Rm MEC 327, Newark, NJ, 07102-1982, USA. eonsoo.lee@njit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5863-3108

Funding

National Science Foundation NSF IIP-1643861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating microfluidics with biosensors is of great research interest with the increasing trend of lab-on-the chip and point-of-care devices. Though there have been numerous studies performed relating microfluidics to the biosensing mechanisms, the study of the sensitivity variation due to microfluidic flow is very much limited. In this paper, the sensitivity of interdigitated electrodes was evaluated at the static drop condition and the microfluidic flow condition. In addition, this study demonstrates the use of gold nanoparticles to enhance the sensor signal response and provides experimental results of the capacitance difference during cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) antigen-antibody conjugation at multiple concentrations of CA-125 antigens. The experimental results also provide evidence of disease-specific detection of CA-125 antigen at multiple concentrations with the increase in capacitive signal response proportional to the concentration of the CA-125 antigens. The capacitive signal response of antigen-antibody conjugation on interdigitate electrodes has been enhanced by approximately 2.8 times (from 260.80 to 736.33 pF at 20 kHz frequency) in static drop condition and approximately 2.5 times (from 205.85 to 518.48 pF at 20 kHz frequency) in microfluidic flow condition with gold nanoparticle-coating. The capacitive signal response is observed to decrease at microfluidic flow condition at both plain interdigitated electrodes (from 260.80 to 205.85 pF at 20 kHz frequency) and gold nano particle coated interdigitated electrodes (from 736.33 to 518.48 pF at 20 kHz frequency), due to the strong shear effect compared to static drop condition. However, the microfluidic channel in the biosensor has the potential to increase the signal to noise ratio due to plasma separation from the whole blood and lead to the increase concentration of the biomarkers in the blood volume for sensing.

Indexed as

BiosensorCapacitance measurementsGold nanoparticlesInterdigitated gold electrodesMicrofluidic channel

Identifiers

PMID30652204
PMCPMC6335232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.