Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30652006›Full record

ReviewHuman genome variation2019

Genetics of narcolepsy.

Taku Miyagawa, Katsushi Tokunaga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genome variation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Narcolepsy and psychosis: A systematic review.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Giggle incontinence: a scoping review.Pediatric research · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Genes · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Central sleep apnea and daytime sleepiness in Niemann-Pick type C disease: a report of 2 cases.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. HLA-G and the MHC Cusp Theory.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  17. A practical guide to the pharmacological and behavioral therapy of Narcolepsy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Taku Miyagawa1Sleep Disorders Project, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsushi Tokunaga2Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Narcolepsy is a term that was initially coined by Gélineáu in 1880 and is a chronic neurological sleep disorder that manifests as a difficulty in maintaining wakefulness and sleep for long periods. Currently, narcolepsy is subdivided into two types according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, 3rd edition: narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and narcolepsy type 2 (NT2). NT1 is characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, hypnagogic hallucinations, and sleep paralysis and is caused by a marked reduction in neurons in the hypothalamus that produce orexin (hypocretin), which is a wakefulness-associated neuropeptide. Except for cataplexy, NT2 exhibits most of the same symptoms as NT1. NT1 is a multifactorial disease, and genetic variations at multiple loci are associated with NT1. Almost all patients with NT1 carry the specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allele

Identifiers

PMID30652006
PMCPMC6325123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.