Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651968›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematologic oncology2018

Current trends in the management of Richter's syndrome.

John N Allan, Richard R Furman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Richter Transformation: Clinical Manifestations, Evaluation, and Management.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AKT: a key to RT?Blood · 2021
    Article
  18. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John N AllanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Richard R FurmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Cornell University · USNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Richter's syndrome (RS) is a life-threatening complication of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). While previous research has increased our knowledge on the distinct evolutionary patterns of RS and provided a deeper understanding of the risk factors and molecular events predisposing to transformation, there remain few targetable aberrations and treatment is largely ineffective. The ability to obtain deeper remissions, without selecting for deletion 17p, by using novel B-cell receptor (BCR) antagonists and bcl2 inhibition might lead to a decrease in the incidence of RS, but these agents have done little to significantly change outcomes when incorporated into treatment regimens for RS. In this review we highlight the current landscape of molecular lesions specific to RS, review the data on historical treatment options, and look to the horizon for potential opportunities in the future.

Indexed as

managementnovel agentsRichter's syndromeRichter's transformation

Identifiers

PMID30651968
PMCPMC6331753
OpenAlexW2910428377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.