ArticleGenes & nutrition2019
Is
Article in Genes & nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plant polysaccharide nanoparticles: Preparation, applications, andFood chemistry: X · 2026Review
- An Accurate Method Based on Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Quantification of Five Cannabinoids in Juvenile and Adult Caenorhabditis elegans.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Undernutrition-induced stunting-like phenotype inNarra J · 2024Article
- Assessment of the effects of cannabidiol and a CBD-rich hemp extract inFrontiers in toxicology · 2024Article
- Structured Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) Enhances Motility and Promotes the Antioxidant Capacity of AgedCells · 2023Article
- Application of Fluorescence Microscopy and Behavioral Assays to Demonstrating Neuronal Connectomes and Neurotransmitter Systems inNeuromethods · 2021Article
- Bacteria increase host micronutrient availability: mechanisms revealed by studies in C. elegans.Genes & nutrition · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The suitability of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.