Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651889›Full record

ArticleEuropean review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity2019

The Siconolfi step test: a valid and reliable assessment of cardiopulmonary fitness in older men with prostate cancer.

Agnieszka Lemanska, Karen Poole, Jonathan J Aning, Bruce A Griffin, Ralph Manders, John M Saxton, Joe Wainwright, Sara Faithfull

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Agnieszka Lemanska1Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4849-2430
Karen Poole1Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Jonathan J Aning2Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Bruce A Griffin1Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Ralph Manders1Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
John M Saxton4Department of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Joe Wainwright1Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Sara Faithfull1Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
University of Surrey · GBNorthumbria University · GBSouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing fitness and promoting regular physical activity can improve health outcomes and early recovery in prostate cancer. This is however, underutilised in clinical practice. The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is increasingly being used pre-treatment to measure aerobic capacity and peak oxygen consumption (VO

resultsSixty-six men provided data for both SST and CPET. These data were used for validity analysis. 56 men provided SST data on both visits. These data were used for reliability analysis. SST provided valid prediction of the cardiopulmonary fitness in men > 60 years old. The average difference between CPET and SST was 0.64 ml/kg/min with non-significant positive bias towards CPET (

conclusionsSST provides a valid and reliable alternative to CPET for the assessment of cardiopulmonary fitness in older men with prostate cancer. Caution is advised when assessing men 60 years old or younger because the VO

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary fitnessClinical assessmentPrehabilitationProstate cancerSiconolfi step test

Identifiers

PMID30651889
PMCPMC6327593
OpenAlexW2919457718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.