ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Application of different anesthetic methods in coronary artery bypass grafting and the effect on postoperative outcome.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a concept analysis.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024Review
- Volatile Anaesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anaesthesia for Cardiac Surgery-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- An Update on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Following Cardiac Surgery.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application of different anesthetic methods in coronary artery bypass grafting and its effect on postoperative outcome were explored. Ninety-four patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in Jining No. 1 People's Hospital from March 2017 to February 2018 were randomly divided into the control and observation groups. The control group was anesthetized by fentanyl and propofol. The observation group was anesthetized by sevoflurane combined anesthesia. The mean heart rates (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and cardiac index (CI) in the two groups were compared. The levels of β endorphin (β-EP) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in patients were examined. Adverse reactions in the two groups were compared. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the changes of serum inflammatory factors. The prognosis of the two groups was analyzed and compared. MoCA and MMSE scale were used to evaluate postoperative cognitive function in the two groups. The levels of β-EP and MDA in the two groups during operation were higher than those before operation (P<0.05). On the third, fifth and seventh day after operation, the CRP, TNF-α and IL-6 levels of the two groups increased significantly compared to those before operation (P<0.05). The eating time and out of bed time in the observation group were significantly earlier than those in the control group, and the length of stay in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). On the first day after operation, the scores of MoCA and MMSE in the observation group were better than those in the control group (P<0.05). The two different anesthetic methods can maintain the perioperative hemodynamic stability of coronary artery bypass patients, but sevoflurane intravenous-inhalation combined anesthesia can effectively adjust the β-EP in the body, and reduce the oxidative stress response, which is favorable for postoperative outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.