Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651716›Full record

ArticleSarcoma2018

Using the Spleen as an

Justin E Markel, Jabeen Noore, Eric J Emery, Harley J Bobnar, Eugenie S Kleinerman, Brock A Lindsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sarcoma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Function ofEJNMMI reports · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Synthesis, Characterization, andJournal of immunology research · 2022
    Article
  17. Stiffness of targeted layer-by-layer nanoparticles impacts elimination half-life, tumor accumulation, and tumor penetration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Justin E MarkelDepartment of Orthopaedics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Jabeen NooreDepartment of Orthopaedics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Eric J EmerySchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Harley J BobnarWashington and Jefferson College, Washington, PA, USA.
Eugenie S KleinermanThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4280-3031
Brock A LindseyDepartment of Orthopaedics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1073-5372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indications for immunotherapies are still unclear, and there is a great need for real-time patient immune status monitoring. In this study, we confirmed that the local and systemic immune profiles of an orthotopic osteosarcoma model with or without luciferase transfection were statistically equivalent. Next, we used flow cytometry to describe systemic immune cell populations influenced by osteosarcoma disease progression. When compared to vehicle-inoculated sham mice, it was found that tumor-bearing mice had significant immunophenotype disturbances at approximately 11 weeks after inoculation (at which time 90% of primary tumor-bearing mice have fulminant pulmonary metastases). Percent populations of natural killer cells and T regulatory cells were increased in the spleens of tumor-bearing mice (

Identifiers

PMID30651716
PMCPMC6311869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.