Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651700›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP

Experimental model of oral ulcer in mice: Comparing wound healing in three immunologically distinct animal lines.

Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, Érian Bezerra Belo de Codes, Milena Oliveira Freitas, Joyce Ohana de Lima Martins, Ana Paula Negreiros Nunes Alves, Fabrício Bitu Sousa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Elysee Exosome Versus Cellbooster Lift in Oral Wound Healing.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paulo Goberlânio de Barros SilvaDepartment of Dentistry, Unichristus, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Érian Bezerra Belo de CodesDepartment of Dentistry, Unichristus, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Milena Oliveira FreitasDepartment of Dentistry, Unichristus, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Joyce Ohana de Lima MartinsDepartment of Dentistry, Unichristus, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ana Paula Negreiros Nunes AlvesDepartment of Dental Clinic, Sector of Oral Pathology, Universidade Federal Do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Fabrício Bitu SousaDepartment of Dentistry, Unichristus, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Unichristus · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe oral wound healing is dependent of immune participation and the absence or augment of one specific immune profile can delayed wound healing.

objectivesSo, the objective of this study was t evaluate the wound healing of oral traumatic ulcer (OTU) in cheek mucosa of swiss, balb/c and c57bl6J mice. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 144 mice (25-30g) were distributed in three groups: swiss (

resultsThere are no differences between ulcer area in three groups; however only swiss group showed total wound healing. Swiss group showed weight loss in 2

conclusionBalb/c mice showed high infection of OTU surface delaying wound healing, and greater weight loss. C57bl/6J mice showed low infection of OTU, but not healing along the eight days. Only the Swiss mice showed wound healing of OTU.

Indexed as

Miceoral ulcerth1-th2 balancewound healing

Identifiers

PMID30651700
PMCPMC6306613
OpenAlexW2917429335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.