Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651582›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2019

Germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes in high grade serous ovarian cancer in Serbia.

Ana Krivokuca, Ivana Boljevic, Stevo Jovandic, Zvonko Magic, Aljosa Mandic, Zorica Tomasevic, Mirjana Brankovic-Magic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Clinical significance of RAD51C and its contribution to ovarian carcinogenesis.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana KrivokucaInstitute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Pasterova 14, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia. krivokuca.ana@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-6981
Ivana BoljevicInstitute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Pasterova 14, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Stevo JovandicMilitary Medical Academy, Crnotravska 17, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Zvonko MagicMilitary Medical Academy, Crnotravska 17, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aljosa MandicOncology Institute of Vojvodina, Put doktora Goldmana 4, 21204, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.
Zorica TomasevicInstitute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Pasterova 14, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Mirjana Brankovic-MagicInstitute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Pasterova 14, 11 000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Oncology Institute of Vojvodina · RSMilitary Medical Academy · RSUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical criteria for genetic testing of genes other than BRCA1/2 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) still do not exist. We assessed the frequency and predictors of deleterious mutations in 19 cancer predisposition genes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) in Serbia. Next-generation sequencing was used to identify germline mutations in the whole coding regions of a gene panel. Patients' characteristics and sequencing data were summarized with descriptive statistics and compared using chi-square test. Among 131 HGSOC patients, 23 had BRCA1 (17.6%) while 5 had BRCA2 (3.8%) mutation. In addition, 9 (6.9%) pathogenic mutations were detected in other genes including BRIP1 (n = 2;1.5%), CHEK2 (n = 2;1.5%), NBN (n = 3;2.3%) and RAD51C (n = 2;1.5%). Factors that predicted for BRCA1/2 mutations were: breast and ovarian cancers in the same patient (p = 0.031), young age of EOC (p = 0.029), menstrual status (p = 0.004) and family history of cancer (p < 0.0001). However, these factors did not predict for mutations in other cancer susceptibility genes. Applying established referral criteria for genetic testing in Serbia will help identify BRCA1/2 mutation carriers but will not help identify mutations in other cancer susceptibility genes. Until better predictors emerge we should be performing wider genetic testing of EOC in order to identify all mutation carriers.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DNA-Binding ProteinsFanconi Anemia Complementation Group ProteinsFemaleGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRIP1 protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsFanconi Anemia Complementation Group ProteinsNBN protein, humanNuclear ProteinsRAD51C protein, humanRNA Helicases

Identifiers

PMID30651582
OpenAlexW2910904420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.