ArticleSpinal cord2019
The Graph-DCK Scale: a measure of dorsal column function after spinal cord injury.
Article in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase 1 Safety Trial of Autologous Human Schwann Cell Transplantation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of neurotrauma · 2022Article
- VSA-3000: A Quantitative Vibration Sensation Testing Device for Patients With Central Nervous System Injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designCohort/psychometric study.
objectivesAssessment of dorsal column medial lemniscus (DCML) function is important for the clinical evaluation of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) because it provides useful information to guide rehabilitation and for prognosticating outcomes. For example, research suggests that damage to the DCML pathway may be associated with neuropathic pain after SCI. Tests for graphesthesia and directional cutaneous kinesthesia (DCK) are commonly used clinically to assess DCML function. However, the reliability and validity of these assessments in people with SCI have not been investigated. Moreover, there is a poor consistency between studies in the methodology of graphesthesia and DCK assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Graph-DCK Scale, which is a simple and potentially useful scale for assessing graphesthesia and DCK. The Graph-DCK Scale does not require expensive equipment and it takes less than 5 min to administer.
settingA university-based laboratory in Miami, FL, USA.
methodsSixty-seven people with chronic SCI and neuropathic pain were included in this study. The Graph-DCK Scale and vibration detection were measured twice in each participant, with a two- to four-week period between measurement sessions.
resultsThe scale demonstrated an excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.90) and test-retest reliability (ICC values > 0.80). Further, convergent validity was supported by moderate and significant positive correlations to vibration detection (r values > 0.40).
conclusionThe Graph-DCK Scale is quick and easy to administer, and it provides a reliable and valid assessment of DCML function in people with SCI. SPONSORSHIP: Craig Neilsen Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.