Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651543›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Image-based modeling of kidney branching morphogenesis reveals GDNF-RET based Turing-type mechanism and pattern-modulating WNT11 feedback.

Denis Menshykau, Odyssé Michos, Christine Lang, Lisa Conrad, Andrew P McMahon, Dagmar Iber

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Broadening horizons: Pathogenesis and therapeutics of renal ciliopathies.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Mechanics of Building Functional Organs.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2025
    Review
  8. The dynamics of tubulogenesis in development and disease.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Systems for intricate patterning of the vertebrate anatomy.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Denis MenshykauDepartment for Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058, Basel, Switzerland. denis.menshykau@gmail.com.
Odyssé MichosDepartment for Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0002-4315
Christine LangDepartment for Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Lisa ConradDepartment for Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrew P McMahonDepartment of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Dagmar IberDepartment for Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058, Basel, Switzerland. dagmar.iber@bsse.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8051-1035

Funding

Cell Interactions in Development of the Mammalian KidneyR37DK054364 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MCMAHON, ANDREW P. · 2008 to 2017
$7.0M
CELL INTERACTIONS IN DEVELOPMENT OF THE MAMMALIAN KIDNEYR01DK054364 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MCMAHON, ANDREW P. · 1998 to 2022
$6.9M
Four-dimensional Modeling of Mouse and Human Nephrogenesis.U01DK110792 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MCMAHON, ANDREW P. · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK054364NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK054364NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK110792NIH HHS DK054364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Branching patterns and regulatory networks differ between branched organs. It has remained unclear whether a common regulatory mechanism exists and how organ-specific patterns can emerge. Of all previously proposed signalling-based mechanisms, only a ligand-receptor-based Turing mechanism based on FGF10 and SHH quantitatively recapitulates the lung branching patterns. We now show that a GDNF-dependent ligand-receptor-based Turing mechanism quantitatively recapitulates branching of cultured wildtype and mutant ureteric buds, and achieves similar branching patterns when directing domain outgrowth in silico. We further predict and confirm experimentally that the kidney-specific positive feedback between WNT11 and GDNF permits the dense packing of ureteric tips. We conclude that the ligand-receptor based Turing mechanism presents a common regulatory mechanism for lungs and kidneys, despite the differences in the molecular implementation. Given its flexibility and robustness, we expect that the ligand-receptor-based Turing mechanism constitutes a likely general mechanism to guide branching morphogenesis and other symmetry breaks during organogenesis.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalOrganogenesisAnimalsBacterial ProteinsComputer SimulationEmbryo, MammalianFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidneyLuminescent ProteinsMiceMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, FluorescenceOrgan Culture TechniquesBacterial ProteinsGdnf protein, mouseGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorLuminescent ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRet protein, mouseWnt11 protein, mouseWnt Proteinsyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID30651543
PMCPMC6484223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.