Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651533›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Energetic equivalence underpins the size structure of tree and phytoplankton communities.

Daniel M Perkins, Andrea Perna, Rita Adrian, Pedro Cermeño, Ursula Gaedke, Maria Huete-Ortega, Ethan P White, Gabriel Yvon-Durocher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long-term experimental evolution decouples size and production costs inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Metabolism drives demography in an experimental field test.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel M PerkinsDepartment of Life Sciences, Whitelands College, University of Roehampton, London, SW15 4JD, UK. daniel.perkins@roehampton.ac.uk.
Andrea PernaDepartment of Life Sciences, Whitelands College, University of Roehampton, London, SW15 4JD, UK.
Rita AdrianLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Department of Ecosystem Research, Müggelseedamm 301, 12587, Berlin, Germany.
Pedro CermeñoInstitute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3902-3475
Ursula GaedkeInstitute for Biology, University of Potsdam, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Maria Huete-OrtegaOroboros Instruments, Schöpfstraße 18, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ethan P WhiteDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Gabriel Yvon-DurocherEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ, UK. G.Yvon-Durocher@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-3417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The size structure of autotroph communities - the relative abundance of small vs. large individuals - shapes the functioning of ecosystems. Whether common mechanisms underpin the size structure of unicellular and multicellular autotrophs is, however, unknown. Using a global data compilation, we show that individual body masses in tree and phytoplankton communities follow power-law distributions and that the average exponents of these individual size distributions (ISD) differ. Phytoplankton communities are characterized by an average ISD exponent consistent with three-quarter-power scaling of metabolism with body mass and equivalence in energy use among mass classes. Tree communities deviate from this pattern in a manner consistent with equivalence in energy use among diameter size classes. Our findings suggest that whilst universal metabolic constraints ultimately underlie the emergent size structure of autotroph communities, divergent aspects of body size (volumetric vs. linear dimensions) shape the ecological outcome of metabolic scaling in forest vs. pelagic ecosystems.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAutotrophic ProcessesBiomassBiotaEnergy MetabolismForestsPhytoplanktonTrees

Identifiers

PMID30651533
PMCPMC6335468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.