Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651361›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2019

Biological and Molecular Characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Mitovirus 1 Reveals a Distinct Small RNA Response Compared to Those of Cytoplasmic RNA Viruses.

L Nerva, G Vigani, D Di Silvestre, M Ciuffo, M Forgia, W Chitarra, M Turina

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mycovirus-induced hypovirulence in notorious fungi Sclerotinia: a comprehensive review.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Review
  12. Anastomosis Groups and Mycovirome ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Characterization of a Novel Mitovirus InfectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L NervaInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, CNR, Turin, Italy.
G ViganiPlant Physiology Unit, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
D Di SilvestreInstitute for Biomedical Technology, CNR, Segrate, Milan, Italy.
M CiuffoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, CNR, Turin, Italy.
M ForgiaInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, CNR, Turin, Italy.
W ChitarraInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, CNR, Turin, Italy.
M TurinaInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, CNR, Turin, Italy massimo.turina@ipsp.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9659-9470
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection · ITCereal Research Centre · ITInstitute of Biomedical Technologies · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indirect evidence of mitochondrial viruses in plants comes from discovery of genomic fragments integrated into the nuclear and mitochondrial DNA of a number of plant species. Here, we report the existence of replicating mitochondrial virus in plants: from transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) data of infected

Indexed as

Chenopodium quinoaCytoplasmGenome, ViralOpen Reading FramesPlant DiseasesPlant VirusesRNA, ViralRNA VirusesViral ProteinsVirus ReplicationRNA, ViralViral Proteinsdefencemitochondriamitovirusplant virus

Identifiers

PMID30651361
PMCPMC6430534
OpenAlexW2910945436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.