Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651326›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Superficial Layers Suppress the Deep Layers to Fine-tune Cortical Coding.

Scott R Pluta, Greg I Telian, Alexander Naka, Hillel Adesnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Population encoding of stimulus features along the visual hierarchy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Population encoding of stimulus features along the visual hierarchy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott R PlutaDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology and the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, and.ORCID 0000-0002-3057-8095
Greg I TelianDepartment of Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907.ORCID 0000-0002-6982-3182
Alexander NakaDepartment of Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907.ORCID 0000-0003-0219-039X
Hillel AdesnikDepartment of Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 hadesnik@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3796-8643

Funding

New Optical Strategies to Unlock the Neural Basis of PerceptionDP2NS087725 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ADESNIK, HILLEL · 2013 to 2018
$2.8M
Cell-type specific mechanisms for feedforward inhibition in the neocortical microcircuitF31NS093925 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NAKA, ALEXANDER · 2016 to 2018
$81k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS087725NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS093925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The descending microcircuit from layer 2/3 (L2/3) to layer 5 (L5) is one of the strongest excitatory pathways in the cortex, presumably forming a core component of its feedforward hierarchy. To date, however, no experiments have selectively tested the impact of L2/3 activity on L5 during active sensation. We used optogenetic, cell-type-specific manipulation of L2/3 neurons in the barrel cortex of actively sensing mice (of either sex) to elucidate the significance of this pathway to sensory coding in L5. Contrary to standard models, activating L2/3 predominantly suppressed spontaneous activity in L5, whereas deactivating L2/3 mainly facilitated touch responses in L5. Somatostatin interneurons are likely important to this suppression because their optogenetic deactivation significantly altered the functional impact of L2/3 onto L5. The net effect of L2/3 was to enhance the stimulus selectivity and expand the range of L5 output. These data imply that the core cortical pathway increases the selectivity and expands the range of cortical output through feedforward inhibition.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleInterneuronsMaleMiceNeuronsOptogeneticsPhysical StimulationSomatosensory CortexTouch Perceptionactive sensingcircuitscortexreceptive fieldssensory codingtranslaminar

Identifiers

PMID30651326
PMCPMC6507093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.