Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651225›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2019

Phage Therapy in the Postantibiotic Era.

Fernando L Gordillo Altamirano, Jeremy J Barr

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 565 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
565citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
70.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

565 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 930 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Development andMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  15. Characterization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mechanism ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article

505 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernando L Gordillo AltamiranoSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia fernando.gordilloaltamirano@monash.edu jeremy.barr@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4581-1259
Jeremy J BarrSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia fernando.gordilloaltamirano@monash.edu jeremy.barr@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5603-5294
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is arguably the biggest current threat to global health. An increasing number of infections are becoming harder or almost impossible to treat, carrying high morbidity, mortality, and financial cost. The therapeutic use of bacteriophages, viruses that infect and kill bacteria, is well suited to be part of the multidimensional strategies to combat antibiotic resistance. Although phage therapy was first implemented almost a century ago, it was brought to a standstill after the successful introduction of antibiotics. Now, with the rise of antibiotic resistance, phage therapy is experiencing a well-deserved rebirth. Among the admittedly vast literature recently published on this topic, this review aims to provide a forward-looking perspective on phage therapy and its role in modern society. We cover the key points of the antibiotic resistance crisis and then explain the biological and evolutionary principles that support the use of phages, their interaction with the immune system, and a comparison with antibiotic therapy. By going through up-to-date reports and, whenever possible, human clinical trials, we examine the versatility of phage therapy. We discuss conventional approaches as well as novel strategies, including the use of phage-antibiotic combinations, phage-derived enzymes, exploitation of phage resistance mechanisms, and phage bioengineering. Finally, we discuss the benefits of phage therapy beyond the clinical perspective, including opportunities for scientific outreach and effective education, interdisciplinary collaboration, cultural and economic growth, and even innovative use of social media, making the case that phage therapy is more than just an alternative to antibiotics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial InfectionsClinical Trials as TopicDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansPhage TherapyTreatment Outcomeantibiotic resistancebacteriophagesbacteriophage therapy

Identifiers

PMID30651225
PMCPMC6431132
OpenAlexW2910246763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.