ArticleArthritis research & therapy2019
Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Modified Rodnan Skin Score: Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II).
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nintedanib Therapy Alone and Combined with Mycophenolate in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Pooled it
- Tocilizumab in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Pooled it
- Rituximab in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Pooled it
- Stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- A Phase II randomized controlled trial of oral prednisolone in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (PRedSS).Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023Trial
- Machine-learning classification identifies patients with early systemic sclerosis as abatacept responders via CD28 pathway modulation.JCI insight · 2022Trial
- A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week, phase II, proof-of-concept study of romilkimab (SAR156597) in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2020Trial
- Safety and Efficacy of Lenabasum in a Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Adults With Systemic Sclerosis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2020Trial
- Riociguat in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (RISE-SSc): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2020Trial
- Effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease with mildly impaired lung function: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.Rheumatology international · 2020Trial
- Abatacept in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis: Results of a Phase II Investigator-Initiated, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2020Trial
- Safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: a multicentre French-Italian study.RMD open · 2026Article
- Early progression of systemic sclerosis: a longitudinal cohort study on disease evolution and microvascular changes.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Skin Biopsies Enhance Prediction of Clinical Trajectory in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Combining Pirfenidone With Mycophenolate Mofetil for Systemic Sclerosis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease (Scleroderma Lung Study III): An Investigator-Initiated, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Article
- Rituximab retention rate in systemic sclerosis: a long term real-life multicentre study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Characteristics of skin microbiome associated with disease severity in systemic sclerosis.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 inhibition: a potential treatment target for pulmonary fibrosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Review
- Iguratimod as an alternative therapy for systemic sclerosis and prevention of the occurrence of ischemic digital ulcer.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Skin involvement in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an unmet clinical need.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) using combined data from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (I and II).
methodsMCID estimates for the mRSS at 12 months were calculated using three anchors: change in scores on the Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index from baseline to 12 months, change in scores on the Patient Global Assessment from baseline to 12 months, and answer at 12 month for the Short Form-36 health transition question "Compared to one year ago, how would you rate your health in general now?" We determined the mRSS MCID estimates for all participants and for those with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). We then assessed associations between MCID estimates of mRSS improvement and patient-reported outcomes, using Student's t test to compare the mean differences in patient outcomes between those who met the MCID improvement criteria versus those who did not meet the improvement criteria.
resultsThe mean (SD) mRSS at baseline was 14.75 (10.72) for all participants and 20.93 (9.61) for those with dcSSc. The MCID estimate for mRSS improvement at 12 months ranged from 3 to 4 units for the overall group (improvement of 20-27% from baseline) and was 5 units for those with dcSSc (improvement of 24% from baseline). Those who met the mRSS MCID improvement criteria had statistically significant improvements in scores on the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary, the Transition Dyspnea Index, and joint contractures at 12 months.
conclusionMCID estimates for the mRSS were 3-4 units for all participants and 5 units for those with dcSSc. These findings are consistent with previously reported MCID estimates for systemic sclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.