ArticleSystematic reviews2019
Perioperative use of gabapentinoids for the management of postoperative acute pain: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04495374 (Use of Oral Pregabalin as Preemptive Analgesia in Abdominal Hysterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Use of Oral Pregabalin as Preemptive Analgesia in Abdominal Hysterectomy: Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative pregabalin does not alter behavioural or diffuse noxious inhibitory control responses in 2 rat models of chronic pain.Pain reports · 2026Article
- Practice advisory on the management of the perioperative period of scoliosis correction surgery.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- The Role of Neuroglial Crosstalk and Synaptic Plasticity-Mediated Central Sensitization in Acupuncture Analgesia.Neural plasticity · 2021Review
- Postoperative Pain Management in Pediatric Spinal Fusion Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis.Paediatric drugs · 2020Review
- Perioperative Gabapentinoids: Deflating the Bubble.Anesthesiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOpioids are commonly used for the management of postoperative pain, but their use is limited by important adverse events, such as respiratory depression and the potential for addiction. Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia regimens can be effectively employed to manage postoperative pain and reduce exposure to opioids. Gabapentinoids (pregabalin and gabapentin) represent an attractive class of drugs for use in multimodal regimens. The American Pain Society recommends the use of gabapentinoids during the perioperative period; however, evidence to inform such a recommendation is unclear.
methodsWe will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials evaluating the use of systemic gabapentinoids, in comparison to other analgesic regimens or placebo in adult patients undergoing surgery. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for relevant citations. Our primary outcome will be intensity of postoperative acute pain (12 h). Our secondary outcomes will be postoperative pain intensity at 6, 24, 48 h, and 72 h, cumulative dose of opioids administered within 24, 48, and 72 h following surgery, the length of stay, chronic pain, and adverse events. Two investigators will independently select trials and extract data. We will evaluate the risk of bias of included trials using the Cochrane risk of bias tools. We will represent pooled continuous data as weighted mean differences and pooled dichotomous data as risk ratios with a 95% confidence interval. We will use random effect models and assess statistical heterogeneity with the I DISCUSSION: Our study will provide the best level of evidence to inform the effect of gabapentinoids in the management of postoperative acute pain. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017067029.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.