ArticleBMC medical education2019
Selection and academic success of medical students in Hamburg, Germany.
Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Student background, admission routes, and academic success: a structural mediation analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Position paper on the existing selection procedure in Germany for the degree program human medicine - interim evaluation after four years. Position paper of the student selection (ASA) in the DACH Association for Medical Education (GMA).GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Comparison of academic performance of medical students previously and non-previously graduated from other college courses in a PBL hybrid curriculum.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Predictive validity of admission tests and educational attainment on preclinical academic performance - a multisite study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Predicting First-Semester Performance of First-Year Medical Students in a Changing Landscape.Cureus · 2025Article
- The Influence of Demographic Characteristics on Student Academic Performance in University Admission Tests.Psychology in Russia : state of the art · 2025Article
- [Integration of natural sciences and basic medical subjects in the integrated dentistry program (iMED DENT) at the University of Hamburg].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Review
- German Physicians and Medical Students Do Not Represent the Population They Serve.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Exploring the relationships between first impressions and MMI ratings: a pilot study.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2023Article
- Admission criteria and academic performance in medical school.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Clinical experience can compensate for inferior academic achievements in an undergraduate objective structured clinical examination.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Admission Grades as Predictors of Medical Students' Academic Performance: A Cross-Sectional Study from Saudi Arabia.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2022Article
- Considering vocational training as selection criterion for medical students: evidence for predictive validity.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2022Article
- International medical students' perspectives on factors affecting their academic success in China: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- What do Final Year Medical Students in Germany know and think about Climate Change? - The ClimAttitude Study.Medical education online · 2021Article
- Are different medical school admission tests associated with the outcomes of a simulation-based OSCE?BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Human Cord Blood ILCs - Unusual Like My Career as a Scientist.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Exam performance of different admission quotas in the first part of the state examination in medicine: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- University Admission Test Associates with Academic Performance at the End of Medical Course in a PBL Medical Hybrid Curriculum.Advances in medical education and practice · 2020Article
- Exploring sociodemographic subgroup differences in multiple mini-interview (MMI) performance based on MMI station type and the implications for the predictive fairness of the Hamburg MMI.BMC medical education · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudent selection at Hamburg medical school is based on the combination of a natural science knowledge test (HAM-Nat) and pre-university educational attainment.
methodOf the 1565 medical students enrolled in Hamburg from 2012 to 2015 about half were admitted by an entrance test, half by quotas. First, we analysed sociodemographic determinants of entrance test performance. Then, we used regression analysis to describe the interplay of variables in the prediction of study outcome, the role of sociodemographic factors, and differences in the calibration of educational attainment specific to German federal states.
resultsBetter performance in the entrance test was associated with age over 21, male gender, German nationality, first language German and both parents holding an academic degree - effect sizes were small. No differences were found for the birthplaces of parents (a proxy for migration background). Study outcome differed considerably among admission paths: Students admitted by entrance test or the quota for excellent pre-university educational attainment performed markedly better during the first 3 terms than students admitted by the waiting list quota and the quota for foreign students. Gender differences in study outcome were slight with better performance by males. The relation of pre-university educational attainment to study outcome was moderated by the federal state in which secondary schooling took place. Methods for the equating of state-specific grades are explored. The predictive validity of the HAM-Nat after correction for range restriction was r = .31. The relatively low value of this coefficient may be attributed to 3 factors: 1. self-selection of applicants which leads to a validity-enhancing effect that is not revealed by the predictor-outcome correlation, 2. reduction of variance due to a high selection ratio, and 3. high test difficulty, exceeding the demands of the medical curriculum.
conclusionThe HAM-Nat achieves a small amount of incremental validity over pre-university educational attainment. This effect, obtained from correlational analysis, underestimates the validity of the test, because it does not reflect the role of self-selection and other validity enhancing features of the selection process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.