Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651098›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

Selection and academic success of medical students in Hamburg, Germany.

Hubertus Meyer, Stefan Zimmermann, Johanna Hissbach, Dietrich Klusmann, Wolfgang Hampe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Exploring the relationships between first impressions and MMI ratings: a pilot study.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hubertus MeyerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan ZimmermannDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Johanna HissbachDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Dietrich KlusmannDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Wolfgang HampeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. hampe@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5517-6052
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany (BMBF) 01PL12033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudent selection at Hamburg medical school is based on the combination of a natural science knowledge test (HAM-Nat) and pre-university educational attainment.

methodOf the 1565 medical students enrolled in Hamburg from 2012 to 2015 about half were admitted by an entrance test, half by quotas. First, we analysed sociodemographic determinants of entrance test performance. Then, we used regression analysis to describe the interplay of variables in the prediction of study outcome, the role of sociodemographic factors, and differences in the calibration of educational attainment specific to German federal states.

resultsBetter performance in the entrance test was associated with age over 21, male gender, German nationality, first language German and both parents holding an academic degree - effect sizes were small. No differences were found for the birthplaces of parents (a proxy for migration background). Study outcome differed considerably among admission paths: Students admitted by entrance test or the quota for excellent pre-university educational attainment performed markedly better during the first 3 terms than students admitted by the waiting list quota and the quota for foreign students. Gender differences in study outcome were slight with better performance by males. The relation of pre-university educational attainment to study outcome was moderated by the federal state in which secondary schooling took place. Methods for the equating of state-specific grades are explored. The predictive validity of the HAM-Nat after correction for range restriction was r = .31. The relatively low value of this coefficient may be attributed to 3 factors: 1. self-selection of applicants which leads to a validity-enhancing effect that is not revealed by the predictor-outcome correlation, 2. reduction of variance due to a high selection ratio, and 3. high test difficulty, exceeding the demands of the medical curriculum.

conclusionThe HAM-Nat achieves a small amount of incremental validity over pre-university educational attainment. This effect, obtained from correlational analysis, underestimates the validity of the test, because it does not reflect the role of self-selection and other validity enhancing features of the selection process.

Indexed as

School Admission CriteriaSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalAptitude TestsCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleGermanyHumansMaleNatural Science DisciplinesKnowledge testMedical school selectionPredictive validityReciprocal suppressionSelf-selection

Identifiers

PMID30651098
PMCPMC6335698
OpenAlexW2911046582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.