Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651075›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Pleural IFN-γ release assay combined with biomarkers distinguished effectively tuberculosis from malignant pleural effusion.

Yimin Tang, Juanjuan Zhang, Huarong Huang, Xing He, Jiaohong Zhang, Min Ou, Guobao Li, Changchun Zeng, Taosheng Ye, Lili Ren and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Development of a diagnostic nomogram for tuberculous pleural effusion.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yimin TangDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, University of South China, Shenzhen, 518112, China.
Juanjuan ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Shenzhen, 518110, China.
Huarong HuangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, University of South China, Shenzhen, 518112, China.
Xing HeGuangdong Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, University of South China, Shenzhen, 518112, China.
Jiaohong ZhangDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, University of South China, Shenzhen, 518112, China.
Min OuDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, University of South China, Shenzhen, 518112, China.
Guobao LiDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, University of South China, Shenzhen, 518112, China.
Changchun ZengDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Shenzhen, 518110, China.
Taosheng YeDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, University of South China, Shenzhen, 518112, China.
Lili RenMOH Key Laboratory of Systems Biology of Pathogens and Christophe Mérieux Laboratory, IPB, CAMS-Fondation Mérieux, Institute of Pathogen Biology (IPB), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yingxia LiuGuangdong Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, University of South China, Shenzhen, 518112, China. yingxialiu@hotmail.com.
Guoliang ZhangGuangdong Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, University of South China, Shenzhen, 518112, China. szdsyy@aliyun.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3617-5449
Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital · CNGuangdong Medical College · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China 81501714Natural Science Foundation of China 81873958Shenzhen Scientific and Technological Foundation JCYJ20170307095003051Shenzhen Scientific and Technological Foundation JCYJ20170412151620658Thirteenth-Fifth Mega-Scientific Projects 2017ZX10103004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health concern on a global scale, especially in developing nations. So far, no formal guidelines are available for the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis pleurisy. The diagnosis of TB is worsened by the immense difficulty in differential determination of tuberculosis pleural effusion (TPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE). The purpose of this investigation is to assess the differential diagnostic efficiencies of the pleural IFN-γ release assay (IGRA) and widely-used biochemical parameters in the distinction analysis of TPE and MPE.

methodsA cohort of 222 patients with pleural effusion was examined, comprising of 143 TPE and 58 MPE patients. The patients were examined with IGRA, and the widely-used biomarkers in the pleural effusion and peripheral blood.

resultsOur results show that the TPE patients have significantly higher M. tuberculosis (Mtb) antigen-specific IFN-γ responses to ESAT-6 protein and peptide pool in the blood compared to MPE patients. TPE patients were also shown to have enriched Mtb antigen-specific IFN-γ responses in pleural effusion than in peripheral blood. Among the widely-used biomarkers, the adenosine deaminase (ADA) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in pleural effusion were better biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity to discriminate TPE and MPE. In addition, pleural IGRA could not be affected by the pleural adhesion, and the applications of the pleural IGRA together with ADA and CEA provide a promising approach for the TPE and MPE differential identification.

conclusionsOur study proposes that the integration of pleural IGRA and ADA, CEA detection could add to more effective diagnosis stratagems in the discernment between TPE and MPE.

Indexed as

Adenosine DeaminaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCarcinoembryonic AntigenChildFemaleHumansInterferon-gammaMaleMiddle AgedPleural EffusionPleural Effusion, MalignantSensitivity and SpecificityAdenosine DeaminaseBiomarkersCarcinoembryonic AntigenInterferon-gammaAdenosine deaminaseCarcinoembryonic antigenIFN-γ release assayMalignant pleural effusionTuberculosis pleural effusion

Identifiers

PMID30651075
PMCPMC6335673
OpenAlexW2947074776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.