Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30651067›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

MITK-ModelFit: A generic open-source framework for model fits and their exploration in medical imaging - design, implementation and application on the example of DCE-MRI.

Charlotte Debus, Ralf Floca, Michael Ingrisch, Ina Kompan, Klaus Maier-Hein, Amir Abdollahi, Marco Nolden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. aXonica: A support package for MRI based Neuroimaging.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Feasibility and robustness of dynamicScientific reports · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotte DebusGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany. c.debus@dkfz-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7156-2022
Ralf FlocaHeidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany. r.floca@dkfz-heidelberg.de.
Michael IngrischDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ina KompanHeidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus Maier-HeinHeidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
Amir AbdollahiGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
Marco NoldenDivision of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01IB13001BDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KFO-214Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB/TRR 125Deutsche Krebshilfe Max-Eder 108876National Center for Tumor diseases NCT 3.0-2015.22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany medical imaging techniques utilize fitting approaches for quantitative parameter estimation and analysis. Common examples are pharmacokinetic modeling in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computed tomography (CT), apparent diffusion coefficient calculations and intravoxel incoherent motion modeling in diffusion-weighted MRI and Z-spectra analysis in chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI. Most available software tools are limited to a special purpose and do not allow for own developments and extensions. Furthermore, they are mostly designed as stand-alone solutions using external frameworks and thus cannot be easily incorporated natively in the analysis workflow.

resultsWe present a framework for medical image fitting tasks that is included in the Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit MITK, following a rigorous open-source, well-integrated and operating system independent policy. Software engineering-wise, the local models, the fitting infrastructure and the results representation are abstracted and thus can be easily adapted to any model fitting task on image data, independent of image modality or model. Several ready-to-use libraries for model fitting and use-cases, including fit evaluation and visualization, were implemented. Their embedding into MITK allows for easy data loading, pre- and post-processing and thus a natural inclusion of model fitting into an overarching workflow. As an example, we present a comprehensive set of plug-ins for the analysis of DCE MRI data, which we validated on existing and novel digital phantoms, yielding competitive deviations between fit and ground truth.

conclusionsProviding a very flexible environment, our software mainly addresses developers of medical imaging software that includes model fitting algorithms and tools. Additionally, the framework is of high interest to users in the domain of perfusion MRI, as it offers feature-rich, freely available, validated tools to perform pharmacokinetic analysis on DCE MRI data, with both interactive and automatized batch processing workflows.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsContrast MediaSoftwareDiagnostic ImagingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingGlioblastomaHumansImage EnhancementTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaDynamic PETModel fittingMulti-purposePharmacokinetic modelingSoftware developmentTracer-kinetics

Identifiers

PMID30651067
PMCPMC6335810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.