Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30650591›Full record

ArticleCancers2019

On the Mechanism of Hyperthermia-Induced BRCA2 Protein Degradation.

Nathalie van den Tempel, Alex N Zelensky, Hanny Odijk, Charlie Laffeber, Christine K Schmidt, Inger Brandsma, Jeroen Demmers, Przemek M Krawczyk, Roland Kanaar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Neurosurgical Applications of Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy.Neurosurgery clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nathalie van den TempelDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Oncode Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. n.van.den.tempel@umcg.nl.
Alex N ZelenskyDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Oncode Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. o.zelenskyy@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2664-271X
Hanny OdijkDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Oncode Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.odijk@erasmusmc.nl.
Charlie LaffeberDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Oncode Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. c.laffeber@erasmusmc.nl.
Christine K SchmidtDepartment of Biochemistry, The Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK. christine.schmidt@manchester.ac.uk.
Inger BrandsmaDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Oncode Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. inger.brandsma@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3257-2540
Jeroen DemmersDepartment of Biochemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.demmers@erasmusmc.nl.
Przemek M KrawczykDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.krawczyk@amc.uva.nl.
Roland KanaarDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Oncode Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. r.kanaar@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding EMCR 2015-7846Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Gravitation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) is a designation for a number of pathways that protects our DNA from various damaging agents. In normal cells, the DDR is extremely important for maintaining genome integrity, but in cancer cells these mechanisms counteract therapy-induced DNA damage. Inhibition of the DDR could therefore be used to increase the efficacy of anti-cancer treatments. Hyperthermia is an example of such a treatment-it inhibits a sub-pathway of the DDR, called homologous recombination (HR). It does so by inducing proteasomal degradation of BRCA2 -one of the key HR factors. Understanding the precise mechanism that mediates this degradation is important for our understanding of how hyperthermia affects therapy and how homologous recombination and BRCA2 itself function. In addition, mechanistic insight into the process of hyperthermia-induced BRCA2 degradation can yield new therapeutic strategies to enhance the effects of local hyperthermia or to inhibit HR. Here, we investigate the mechanisms driving hyperthermia-induced BRCA2 degradation. We find that BRCA2 degradation is evolutionarily conserved, that BRCA2 stability is dependent on HSP90, that ubiquitin might not be involved in directly targeting BRCA2 for protein degradation via the proteasome, and that BRCA2 degradation might be modulated by oxidative stress and radical scavengers.

Indexed as

BRCA2homologous recombinationHSP90hyperthermiaprotein degradationRAD51reactive oxygen speciesSILAC mass spectrometryubiquitin

Identifiers

PMID30650591
PMCPMC6356811
OpenAlexW2908673714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.