ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019
Cardiac motion correction for improving perfusion defect detection in cardiac SPECT at standard and reduced doses of activity.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- SMGDiff: step mapping generalized diffusion model for efficient noise reduction in cardiac-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT images.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- DuDoCFNet: Dual-Domain Coarse-to-Fine Progressive Network for Simultaneous Denoising, Limited-View Reconstruction, and Attenuation Correction of Cardiac SPECT.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In cardiac SPECT perfusion imaging, cardiac motion can lead to motion blurring of anatomical detail and perfusion defects in the reconstructed myocardium. In this study, we investigated the potential benefit of cardiac motion correction for improving the detectability of perfusion defects. We considered a post-reconstruction motion correction (PMC) approach in which the image motion between two cardiac gates is obtained with optical flow estimation. In the experiments, we demonstrated the proposed post-reconstruction motion correction with optical flow estimation (PMC-OFE) approach on a set of clinical acquisitions from 194 subjects. We quantified the detectability of perfusion defects in the reconstructed images by using the total perfusion deficit scores, calculated by the clinical software tool QPS, and conducted a receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) study to obtain the detection performance. Besides imaging with conventional standard dose, we also evaluated the approach for reduced dose SPECT imaging where the imaging dose was retrospectively reduced to 50%, 25%, and 12.5% of the standard dose. The proposed PMC-OFE approach achieved at each dose level higher area-under-the-ROC-curve (AUC) for perfusion defect detection than the traditional approach of using ungated data (Non-MC) (p -value < 0.05); in particular, with half dose, PMC-OFE achieved AUC = 0.813, which is comparable to Non-MC with standard dose (AUC = 0.795). Moreover, the proposed PMC-OFE approach also outperformed the 'Motion Frozen' (MF) method implemented in the clinical quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) software. In particular, at 25% and 12.5% of standard dose, the AUC values obtained by PMC-OFE are 0.788 and 0.779, respectively, compared to 0.758 and 0.731 for MF (p -value < 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.