Coronary CT Angiography and Subsequent Risk of Myocardial Infarction.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Coronary atherosclerosis as the main endpoint of non-invasive imaging in cardiology: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020
   Review
2. Challenges and opportunities for nuclear cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Coronary CT Angiography and Subsequent Risk of Myocardial Infarction.2019
• Comment on
  Coronary CT Angiography and Subsequent Risk of Myocardial Infarction.2019
• Comment on
  Coronary CT Angiography and Subsequent Risk of Myocardial Infarction.2019
• Comment on
  Coronary CT Angiography and Subsequent Risk of Myocardial Infarction.2019

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as