Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30650116›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Intestinal bacteria modulate the foraging behavior of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Mazarin Akami, Awawing A Andongma, Chen Zhengzhong, Jiang Nan, Kanjana Khaeso, Edouard Jurkevitch, Chang-Ying Niu, Boaz Yuval

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Insects · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparison of Gut Bacterial Communities of Fall Armyworm (International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mazarin AkamiDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2162-2119
Awawing A AndongmaDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Chen ZhengzhongDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Jiang NanDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Kanjana KhaesoDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Edouard JurkevitchDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Diseases, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Chang-Ying NiuDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Boaz YuvalDepartment of Entomology, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome of insects directly or indirectly affects the metabolism, immune status, sensory perception and feeding behavior of its host. Here, we examine the hypothesis that in the oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis, Diptera: Tephritidae), the presence or absence of gut symbionts affects foraging behavior and nutrient ingestion. We offered protein-starved flies, symbiotic or aposymbiotic, a choice between diets containing all amino acids or only the non-essential ones. The different diets were presented in a foraging arena as drops that varied in their size and density, creating an imbalanced foraging environment. Suppressing the microbiome resulted in significant changes of the foraging behavior of both male and female flies. Aposymbiotic flies responded faster to the diets offered in experimental arenas, spent more time feeding, ingested more drops of food, and were constrained to feed on time-consuming patches (containing small drops of food), when these offered the full complement of amino acids. We discuss these results in the context of previous studies on the effect of the gut microbiome on host behavior, and suggest that these be extended to the life history dimension.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalFeeding BehaviorFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLarvaMalePupaSymbiosisTephritidae

Identifiers

PMID30650116
PMCPMC6334898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.