Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30650099›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Investigating the cultural and contextual determinants of antimicrobial stewardship programmes across low-, middle- and high-income countries-A qualitative study.

Esmita Charani, Ingrid Smith, Brita Skodvin, Anne Perozziello, Jean-Christophe Lucet, François-Xavier Lescure, Gabriel Birgand, Armel Poda, Raheelah Ahmad, Sanjeev Singh and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An approach to capturing the cultural contexts of health behaviours.Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Esmita CharaniNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5938-1202
Ingrid SmithDepartment of Essential medicines and Health Products, World health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Brita SkodvinNorwegian advisory unit for Antibiotic use in Hospitals, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Anne PerozzielloAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Infection Control Unit, Paris, France.
Jean-Christophe LucetAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Infection Control Unit, Paris, France.
François-Xavier LescureAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Infection Control Unit, Paris, France.
Gabriel BirgandNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Armel PodaSchool of Medicine, University Hospital Souro Sanou, University of Bobo Dioulasso, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Raheelah AhmadNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sanjeev SinghDepartment of Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kerala, India.
Alison Helen HolmesNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre · INHaukeland University Hospital · NONazi Boni University · BFWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Department of Health HPRU-2012-10047World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost of the evidence on antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASP) to help sustain the effectiveness of antimicrobials is generated in high income countries. We report a study investigating implementation of ASP in secondary care across low-, middle- and high-income countries. The objective of this study was to map the key contextual, including cultural, drivers of the development and implementation of ASP across different resource settings. MATERIALS AND

methodsHealthcare professionals responsible for implementing ASP in hospitals in England, France, Norway, India, and Burkina Faso were invited to participate in face-to face interviews. Field notes from observations, documentary evidence, and interview transcripts were analysed using grounded theory approach. The key emerging categories were analysed iteratively using constant comparison, initial coding, going back the field for further data collection, and focused coding. Theoretical sampling was applied until the categories were saturated. Cross-validation and triangulation of the findings were achieved through the multiple data sources.

results54 participants from 24 hospitals (England 9 participants/4 hospitals; Norway 13 participants/4 hospitals; France 9 participants/7 hospitals; India 13 participants/ 7 hospitals; Burkina Faso 8 participants/2 hospitals) were interviewed. Across Norway, France and England there was consistency in ASP structures. In India and Burkina Faso there were country level heterogeneity in ASP. State support for ASP was perceived as essential in countries where it is lacking (India, Burkina Faso), and where it was present, it was perceived as a barrier (England, France). Professional boundaries are one of the key cultural determinants dictating involvement in initiatives with doctors recognised as leaders in ASP. Nurse and pharmacist involvement was limited to England. The surgical specialty was identified as most difficult to engage with in each country. Despite challenges, one hospital in India provided the best example of interdisciplinary ASP, championed through organisational leadership.

conclusionsASP initiatives in this study were restricted by professional boundaries and hierarchies, with lack of engagement with the wider healthcare workforce. There needs to be promotion of interdisciplinary team work including pharmacists and nurses, depending on the available healthcare workforce in different countries, in ASP. The surgical pathway remains a hard to reach, but critical target for ASP globally. There is a need to develop contextually driven ASP targeting the surgical pathway in different resource settings.

Indexed as

Socioeconomic FactorsAdultAntimicrobial StewardshipBurkina FasoDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesEnglandFemaleFranceHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansIncomeIndiaInterviews as TopicLeadership

Identifiers

PMID30650099
PMCPMC6335060
OpenAlexW2910593560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.