Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30650076›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Preclinical toxicity and pharmacokinetics of a new orally bioavailable flubendazole formulation and the impact for clinical trials and risk/benefit to patients.

Sophie Lachau-Durand, Lieve Lammens, Bas-Jan van der Leede, Jacky Van Gompel, Graham Bailey, Marc Engelen, Ann Lampo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Testicular immunity.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Advances in preclinical platforms ofFrontiers in tropical diseases · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie Lachau-DurandDrug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Janssen Research & Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Lieve LammensNonclinical Safety, Janssen Research & Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7683-8745
Bas-Jan van der LeedeNonclinical Safety, Janssen Research & Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Jacky Van GompelNonclinical Safety, Janssen Research & Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Graham BaileyNonclinical Safety, Janssen Research & Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Marc EngelenProject Management Office, Janssen Research & Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Ann LampoNonclinical Safety, Janssen Research & Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Janssen (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlubendazole, originally developed to treat infections with intestinal nematodes, has been shown to be efficacious in animal models of filarial infections. For treatment of filarial nematodes, systemic exposure is needed. For this purpose, an orally bioavailable amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) formulation of flubendazole was developed. As this formulation results in improved systemic absorption, the pharmacokinetic and toxicological profile of the flubendazole ASD formulation have been assessed to ensure human safety before clinical trials could be initiated. METHODS &

findingsSafety pharmacology, toxicity and genotoxicity studies have been conducted with the flubendazole ASD formulation. In animals, flubendazole has good oral bioavailability from an ASD formulation ranging from 15% in dogs, 27% in rats to more than 100% in jirds. In in vivo toxicity studies with the ASD formulation, high systemic exposure to flubendazole and its main metabolites was reached. Flubendazole, up to high peak plasma concentrations, does not induce Cmax related effects in CNS or cardiovascular system. In repeated dose toxicity studies in rats and dogs, flubendazole-induced changes were observed in haematological, lymphoid and gastrointestinal systems and in testes. In dogs, the liver was an additional target organ. Upon treatment cessation, at least partial recovery was observed for these changes in dogs. In rats, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was 5 mg (as base)/kg body weight/day (mg eq./kg/day) in males and 2.5 mg eq./kg/day in females. In dogs, the NOAEL was lower than 20 mg eq./kg/day. Regarding genotoxicity, flubendazole was negative in the Ames test, but positive in the in vivo micronucleus test.

conclusionsBased on these results, in combination with previously described genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity data and the outcome of the preclinical efficacy studies, it was concluded that no flubendazole treatment regimen can be selected that would provide efficacy in humans at safe exposure.

Indexed as

Mutagenicity TestsAdministration, OralAnimalsAntinematodal AgentsDogsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFemaleGerbillinaeMaleMebendazoleRats, Sprague-DawleyAntinematodal AgentsflubendazoleMebendazole

Identifiers

PMID30650076
PMCPMC6334931
OpenAlexW2910606785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.