Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649750›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2019

Safety and Tolerability of Adoptive Cell Therapy in Cancer.

Benita Wolf, Stefan Zimmermann, Caroline Arber, Melita Irving, Lionel Trueb, George Coukos

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Research advances on TIL therapy for colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  13. Dual ON/OFF-switch chimeric antigen receptor controlled by two clinically approved drugs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benita WolfDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, 1066, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stefan ZimmermannDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, 1066, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3562-0918
Caroline ArberDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, 1066, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Melita IrvingDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, 1066, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lionel TruebDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, 1066, Lausanne, Switzerland.
George CoukosDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, 1066, Lausanne, Switzerland. George.Coukos@chuv.ch.
Ludwig Cancer Research · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) is a safe and effective personalized cancer immunotherapy that can comprise naturally occurring ex vivo expanded cells (e.g., tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TIL]) or T cells genetically engineered to confer antigen specificity (T-cell receptor [TCR] or chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] engineered T cells) to mediate cancer rejection. In recent years, some ACTs have produced unprecedented breakthrough responses: TIL therapy has moved from melanoma to solid tumor applications, TCR-engineered cells are developed for hematologic and solid tumors, and CAR-engineered T cells have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of patients with certain B-cell malignancies. Although results are encouraging, to date, only a small percentage of patients with advanced malignancies can benefit from ACT. Besides ACT availability and accessibility, treatment-related toxicities represent a major hurdle in the widespread implementation of this therapeutic modality. The large variety of observed toxicities is caused by the infused cell product or as side effects of accompanying medication and chemotherapy. Toxicities can occur immediately or can be delayed. In order to render those highly promising therapeutic approaches safe enough for a wider pool of patients outside of clinical trials, an international consensus for toxicity management needs to be established.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsNervous System DiseasesT-LymphocytesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30649750
OpenAlexW2909137877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.