Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649737›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2019

Detecting Adverse Drug Events with Rapidly Trained Classification Models.

Alec B Chapman, Kelly S Peterson, Patrick R Alba, Scott L DuVall, Olga V Patterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Artificial intelligence in the field of pharmacy practice: A literature review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Review
  11. Clinical concept and relation extraction using prompt-based machine reading comprehension.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alec B ChapmanHealth Fidelity, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Kelly S PetersonVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Patrick R AlbaVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Scott L DuVallVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Olga V PattersonVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. olga.patterson@utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8717-5975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIdentifying occurrences of medication side effects and adverse drug events (ADEs) is an important and challenging task because they are frequently only mentioned in clinical narrative and are not formally reported.

methodsWe developed a natural language processing (NLP) system that aims to identify mentions of symptoms and drugs in clinical notes and label the relationship between the mentions as indications or ADEs. The system leverages an existing word embeddings model with induced word clusters for dimensionality reduction. It employs a conditional random field (CRF) model for named entity recognition (NER) and a random forest model for relation extraction (RE).

resultsFinal performance of each model was evaluated separately and then combined on a manually annotated evaluation set. The micro-averaged F1 score was 80.9% for NER, 88.1% for RE, and 61.2% for the integrated systems. Outputs from our systems were submitted to the NLP Challenges for Detecting Medication and Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Records (MADE 1.0) competition (Yu et al. in http://bio-nlp.org/index.php/projects/39-nlp-challenges , 2018). System performance was evaluated in three tasks (NER, RE, and complete system) with multiple teams submitting output from their systems for each task. Our RE system placed first in Task 2 of the challenge and our integrated system achieved third place in Task 3.

conclusionAdding to the growing number of publications that utilize NLP to detect occurrences of ADEs, our study illustrates the benefits of employing innovative feature engineering.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectronic Health RecordsHumans

Identifiers

PMID30649737
PMCPMC6373386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.