ArticleJournal of neurology2019
High efficacy of rituximab for myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive nationwide study in Austria.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of rituximab in anti-MuSK myasthenia Gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapies in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Rituximab for Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Pharmacological and speech-language pathology management of dysphagia in patients with myasthenia gravis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- MuSK myasthenia gravis: from antigen-antibody to clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A case report of sequential efgartigimod and rituximab treatment for tSNMG.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Differential response to ofatumumab in anti-AChR and anti-MuSK positive myasthenia gravis patients: a single-center retrospective study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Myasthenia gravis: from recognition of heterogeneity to a paradigm shift toward precision therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Patterns and predictors of therapeutic response to efgartigimod in acetylcholine receptor-antibody generalized myasthenia gravis subtypes.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Efgartigimod combined with rituximab helps improve the symptoms and reduce the use of corticosteroids in patients with MuSK antibody-positive MG: a single case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Clinical and laboratory remission with rituximab in anti-MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Rituximab alone is as effective as associated with steroids on naive patients with generalized myasthenia gravis.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Generalized myasthenia gravis with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A guidance for treatment.European journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Myasthenia gravis: the changing treatment landscape in the era of molecular therapies.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024Review
- Efgartigimod treatment in patients with anti-MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis in exacerbation.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Advances in B Cell Targeting for Treating Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase-Associated Myasthenia Gravis.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) need long-term immunosuppressive therapy. However, conventional agents may have intolerable side effects, take too long or fail to achieve disease control. Rituximab (RTX) has emerged as an off-label treatment for refractory MG, but data on its use are still sparse.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective nationwide study contacting all Austrian neurologists to provide anonymized data of all adult MG patients treated with RTX and minimum follow-up of 3 months. The Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Postintervention Status scale was used to assess outcomes.
results34 (60.7%) of a total of 56 patients were women. Median (IQR) age at diagnosis of MG and start of RTX were 41.5 (24.3; 65.8) and 47.5 (33; 71) years, respectively. Antibodies (ab) against acetylcholine receptor (AchR) and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) were present in 69.6% and 25% of patients, respectively (seronegative: 5.4%). Before RTX, 47 (83.9%) patients had had plasma exchange, immune adsorption or immunoglobulins. Three months after RTX, 14 of 53 (26.4%) patients were in remission. At last follow-up after a median of 20 (10; 53) months, remission was present in 42.9% of patients and another 25% had minimal manifestations. Remission was more frequent in patients with MuSK ab vs. those with AchR ab (71.4% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.022). RTX was safe. The presence of MuSK ab independently predicted remission after RTX.
conclusionIn this retrospective study on RTX for MG, the largest to date, RTX appeared safe, efficacious and fast acting. Benefit from RTX was greatest in MuSK ab + MG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.