Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649590›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2019

Urologic provider experiences in transitioning spina bifida patients from pediatric to adult care.

Shree Agrawal, Kimberly Slocombe, Tracey Wilson, Stephanie Kielb, Hadley M Wood

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Perspectives on urological care in spina bifida patients.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shree AgrawalSchool of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 2109 Adelbert Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. shree.agrawal@case.edu.
Kimberly SlocombeUrology, Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Q10-1, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Tracey WilsonDepartment of Urology, University of Alabama Birmingham, FOT 1120, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Stephanie KielbDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University, NMH/Galter Room 20-150, 675 N Saint Clair, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Hadley M WoodUrology, Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Q10-1, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe lack of precedent in transitioning from pediatric to adult care poses a challenge to providers for patients with spina bifida (SB). The purpose of this study was to summarize perceptions about best practices for the care of adult spina bifida patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA national survey was electronically distributed to 174 urologists who are current members of the Spina Bifida Association Network and AUA Working Group on Urologic Congenitalism. De-identified voluntary responses were assessed for implementation of and barriers to interdisciplinary adult SB clinics, continuity of care, and practices for transitioning from pediatric to adult care.

resultsThe response rate was 40% with urologists practicing pediatrics, genitourinary reconstruction, female pelvic medicine and general urology. Patients undergoing transition or who have transitioned were seen in a multidisciplinary clinic (14%), regular adult clinic (34%), combined adult-pediatric multidisciplinary care (20%), or pediatric multidisciplinary clinic (28%). A majority believed transitioning to adult care should occur at 18 (24%) or 21 years (22%). In the absence of acute changes, providers followed adult SB patients annually with upper tract imaging (typically renal ultrasound) and serum creatinine. Acute urologic changes were preferentially managed with urodynamic testing and cystoscopy. Providers identified a need for multidisciplinary care in adult life, with neurosurgery/neurology (87%), social work (84%), and orthopedics (73%).

conclusionsPotential solutions to improve the urologic care of this population suggest additional national provider resources, standardized guidelines, multidisciplinary collaboration, access to care, and an advanced-training pathway to improve care of adult patients with spina bifida.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Transition to Adult CareUrologistsAdolescentContinuity of Patient CareDisease ManagementHumansNeurologyNeurosurgeryOrthopedicsPatient Care TeamSocial WorkSpinal DysraphismUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicYoung AdultNeurogenic bladderSpina bifidaTransitional care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.