Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649569›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology international2019

Level of adherence to prescribed exercise in spondyloarthritis and factors affecting this adherence: a systematic review.

M T McDonald, S Siebert, E H Coulter, D A McDonald, L Paul

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M T McDonaldRheumatology Service, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. M.McDonald.1@research.gla.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4950-5854
S SiebertInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-7311
E H CoulterSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5246-0576
D A McDonaldNursing Midwife and Allied Health Professional Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9805-7720
L PaulSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2869-0309
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 20874Versus Arthritis 20874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adherence is a primary determinant of the effectiveness of any intervention. Exercise is considered essential in the management of spondyloarthritis (SpA); however, the overall adherence to exercise programmes and factors affecting adherence are unknown. The aim of this systematic review was to examine measures of, and factors influencing adherence to, prescribed exercise programmes in people with SpA. A search was performed in August 2018 using five data bases; the Cochrane library, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Collections. Inclusion criteria were: studies with adults (> 18 years) with SpA, with a prescribed exercise intervention or educational programme with the aim of increasing exercise participation. Article quality was independently assessed by two assessors. Extracted descriptive data included: populations, interventions, measures of adherence and factors affecting adherence. Percentage adherence rates to prescribed exercises were calculated if not reported. Nine studies were included with a total of 658 participants, 95% of participants had a diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis. Interventions and measurement of adherence varied, making comparisons difficult. Rates of adherence ranged from 51.4 to 95%. Single studies identified; adherence improved following educational programmes, and higher disease severity and longer diagnostic delays were associated with higher adherence. Conflicting evidence was found as to whether supervision of exercise improved adherence. Three consecutive studies demonstrated adherence reduced over time. Adherence to prescribed exercise in SpA was poorly reported and predominately for people with AS. The levels of adherence and factors affecting prescribed exercise in SpA remain unclear. Future research should measure adherence across a longer time period and investigate possible factors which may influence adherence.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyPatient ComplianceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicQuality Assurance, Health CareResearch DesignSpondylarthritisAdherenceExercisePhysiotherapySpondyloarthritis

Identifiers

PMID30649569
PMCPMC6513902
OpenAlexW2909811524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.