Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649306›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

Evolution of Young Sex Chromosomes in Two Dioecious Sister Plant Species with Distinct Sex Determination Systems.

Hélène Martin, Fantin Carpentier, Sophie Gallina, Cécile Godé, Eric Schmitt, Aline Muyle, Gabriel A B Marais, Pascal Touzet

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  11. Sexy ways: approaches to studying plant sex chromosomes.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Adaptive changes of the autosomal part of the genome in a dioecious clade ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Dosage compensation evolution in plants: theories, controversies and mechanisms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hélène MartinUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo, France.
Fantin CarpentierUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo, France.
Sophie GallinaUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo, France.
Cécile GodéUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo, France.
Eric SchmittUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo, France.
Aline MuyleLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive (UMR 5558), CNRS/Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Gabriel A B MaraisLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive (UMR 5558), CNRS/Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Pascal TouzetUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, progress has been made in methods to identify the sex determination system in plants. This gives the opportunity to study sex chromosomes that arose independently at different phylogenetic scales, and thus allows the discovery and the understanding of early stages of sex chromosome evolution. In the genus Silene, sex chromosomes have evolved independently in at least two clades from a nondioecious ancestor, the Melandrium and Otites sections. In the latter, sex chromosomes could be younger than in the section Melandrium, based on phylogenetic studies and as no heteromorphic sex chromosomes have been detected. This section might also exhibit lability in sex determination, because male heterogamy and female heterogamy have been suggested to occur.In this study, we investigated the sex determination system of two dioecious species in the section Otites (Silene otites and its close relative Silene pseudotites). Applying the new probabilistic method SEX-DETector on RNA-seq data from cross-controlled progenies, we inferred their most likely sex determination system and a list of putative autosomal and sex-linked contigs. We showed that the two phylogenetically close species differed in their sex determination system (XY versus ZW) with sex chromosomes that derived from two different pairs of autosomes. We built a genetic map of the sex chromosomes and showed that both pairs exhibited a large region with lack of recombination. However, the sex-limited chromosomes exhibited no strong degeneration. Finally, using the "ancestral" autosomal expression of sex-linked orthologs of nondioecious S. nutans, we found a slight signature of dosage compensation in the heterogametic females of S. otites.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChromosomes, PlantSex ChromosomesSex Determination ProcessesCaryophyllaceaeGenetic LinkageSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID30649306
PMCPMC6364797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.