Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649252›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

An accurate and powerful method for copy number variation detection.

Feifei Xiao, Xizhi Luo, Ning Hao, Yue S Niu, Xiangjun Xiao, Guoshuai Cai, Christopher I Amos, Heping Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Testing for a Change in Mean After Changepoint Detection.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Feifei XiaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Xizhi LuoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Ning HaoDepartment of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Yue S NiuDepartment of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Xiangjun XiaoDepartment of Quantitative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Guoshuai CaiDepartment of Environmental Health Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Christopher I AmosDepartment of Quantitative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Heping ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
University of South Carolina · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Arizona · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Statistical Methods in Genetic Studies of Substance UseR01DA016750 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HEPING · 2004 to 2016
$3.3M
Analysis of Big Data Squared in Biomedical StudiesR01MH116527 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HEPING · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016750NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIntegration of multiple genetic sources for copy number variation detection (CNV) is a powerful approach to improve the identification of variants associated with complex traits. Although it has been shown that the widely used change point based methods can increase statistical power to identify variants, it remains challenging to effectively detect CNVs with weak signals due to the noisy nature of genotyping intensity data. We previously developed modSaRa, a normal mean-based model on a screening and ranking algorithm for copy number variation identification which presented desirable sensitivity with high computational efficiency. To boost statistical power for the identification of variants, here we present a novel improvement that integrates the relative allelic intensity with external information from empirical statistics with modeling, which we called modSaRa2.

resultsSimulation studies illustrated that modSaRa2 markedly improved both sensitivity and specificity over existing methods for analyzing array-based data. The improvement in weak CNV signal detection is the most substantial, while it also simultaneously improves stability when CNV size varies. The application of the new method to a whole genome melanoma dataset identified novel candidate melanoma risk associated deletions on chromosome bands 1p22.2 and duplications on 6p22, 6q25 and 19p13 regions, which may facilitate the understanding of the possible roles of germline copy number variants in the etiology of melanoma. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://c2s2.yale.edu/software/modSaRa2 or https://github.com/FeifeiXiaoUSC/modSaRa2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNA Copy Number VariationsGenome-Wide Association StudyAllelesData Interpretation, StatisticalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSensitivity and SpecificitySoftware

Identifiers

PMID30649252
PMCPMC6735918
OpenAlexW2908790822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.