Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649229›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2019

Prognostic factors of survival in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Maaike Van Gerwen, Naomi Alpert, Andrea Wolf, Nisha Ohri, Erik Lewis, Kenneth E Rosenzweig, Raja Flores, Emanuela Taioli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pleural Mesothelioma Staging Project: Updated Modeling of Prognostic Factors in Pleural Mesothelioma.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maaike Van GerwenInstitute for Translational Epidemiology and Department of Population Health Science and Policy.
Naomi AlpertInstitute for Translational Epidemiology and Department of Population Health Science and Policy.
Andrea WolfDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Nisha OhriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Erik LewisDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Kenneth E RosenzweigDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Raja FloresDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Emanuela TaioliInstitute for Translational Epidemiology and Department of Population Health Science and Policy.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Funding

THE TISCH CANCER INSTITUTE - CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA196521 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Deanna L Benson · 2015 to 2026
$35.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA196521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with a very poor prognosis. Previous studies have indicated that women experience longer survival compared with men. We analyzed 16 267 eligible patients (21.3% females) in the National Cancer Database to evaluate which clinical factors are independently predictive of longer survival. After adjusting for all covariates, survival was significantly better in females compared with males [HRadj: 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.85]. Other factors significantly associated with better survival were younger age at diagnosis, higher income, lower comorbidity score, epithelial histology, earlier stage and receipt of surgical or medical treatment. After propensity matching, survival was significantly better for females compared with males [hazard ratio (HR): 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.94]. After propensity matching within the epithelial group, survival remained significantly better for females compared with males (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.97). This study adds information to the known significant gender survival difference in MPM by disentangling the effect of gender from the effect of age and histology, two known independent factors affecting survival. Circulating estrogen, present in young but not older women, and higher expression of the estrogen receptor beta in epithelial mesothelioma have been suggested to play a role in gender survival differences. These findings may lead to exploring new therapeutic options, such as targeting estrogen receptor beta, and considering hormonal therapy including estrogens for patients with otherwise limited prognosis.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantMiddle AgedPleural NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID30649229
PMCPMC6556702
OpenAlexW2909876419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.