Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649187›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2019

Trends in Oral Antibiotic Prescription in Dermatology, 2008 to 2016.

John S Barbieri, Ketaki Bhate, Kathleen P Hartnett, Katherine E Fleming-Dutra, David J Margolis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04150523 (Perspectives on Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Dermatologic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04150523 completednot on this map

Perspectives on Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Dermatologic Surgery: a Prospective Multi-center Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2019 to 2021Enrolled338ConditionsMedication AdherenceArmsSurvey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John S BarbieriDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Ketaki BhateDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Kathleen P HartnettDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Katherine E Fleming-DutraDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
David J MargolisDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

Funding

Penn Dermatology Research Training ProgramT32AR007465 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Elizabeth Anne Grice, David Joel Margolis · 1986 to 2026
$9.0M
Department of Health DRF-2018-11-ST2-066NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Dermatologists prescribe more oral antibiotic courses per clinician than any other specialty, and this use puts patients at risk of antibiotic-resistant infections and antibiotic-associated adverse events. Objective: To characterize the temporal trends in the diagnoses most commonly associated with oral antibiotic prescription by dermatologists, as well as the duration of this use. Design, Setting, and Participants: Repeated cross-sectional analysis of antibiotic prescribing by dermatologists from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2016. The setting was Optum Clinformatics Data Mart (Eden Prairie, Minnesota) deidentified commercial claims data. Participants were dermatology clinicians identified by their National Uniform Claim Committee taxonomy codes, and courses of oral antibiotics prescribed by these clinicians were identified by their National Drug Codes. Exposures: Claims for oral antibiotic prescriptions were consolidated into courses of therapy and associated with the primary diagnosis from the most recent visit. Courses were stratified into those of extended duration (>28 days) and those of short duration (≤28 days). Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequency of antibiotic prescribing and associated diagnoses. Poisson regression models were used to assess for changes in the frequency of antibiotic prescribing over time. Results: Between 2008 and 2016 among 985 866 courses of oral antibiotics prescribed by 11 986 unique dermatologists, overall antibiotic prescribing among dermatologists decreased 36.6% (1.23 courses per 100 visits) from 3.36 (95% CI, 3.34-3.38) to 2.13 (95% CI, 2.12-2.14) courses per 100 visits with a dermatologist (prevalence rate ratio for annual change, 0.931; 95% CI, 0.930-0.932), with much of this decrease occurring among extended courses for acne and rosacea. Oral antibiotic use associated with surgical visits increased 69.6% (2.73 courses per 100 visits) from 3.92 (95% CI, 3.83-4.01) to 6.65 (95% CI, 6.57-6.74) courses per 100 visits associated with a surgical visit (prevalence rate ratio, 1.061; 95% CI, 1.059-1.063). Conclusions and Relevance: Continuing to develop alternatives to oral antibiotics for noninfectious conditions, such as acne, can improve antibiotic stewardship and decrease complications from antibiotic use. In addition, the rising use of postoperative antibiotics after surgical visits is concerning and may put patients at unnecessary risk of adverse events. Future studies are needed to identify the value of this practice and the risk of adverse events.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDermatologistsDermatologyDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMaleMinnesotaPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrevalenceRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30649187
PMCPMC6439939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.