Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649185›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

A simple convolutional neural network for prediction of enhancer-promoter interactions with DNA sequence data.

Zhong Zhuang, Xiaotong Shen, Wei Pan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. EPIFBMC: A New Model for Enhancer-Promoter Interaction Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. RAEPI: Predicting Enhancer-Promoter Interactions Based on Restricted Attention Mechanism.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Predicting 3D Genome Organization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhong ZhuangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Xiaotong ShenSchool of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Wei PanDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Association analysis of rare variants with sequencing dataR01HL116720 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, WEI, PENG · 2013 to 2020
$3.3M
Powerful Inference and Prediction for Genetic AssociationR01HL105397 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2011 to 2018
$2.9M
Estimation and Inference of Gene Regulatory NetworksR01GM126002 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
Statistical Methods for Genomic DataR01GM113250 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2014 to 2017
$702k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105397NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116720NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113250NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationEnhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) in the genome play an important role in transcriptional regulation. EPIs can be useful in boosting statistical power and enhancing mechanistic interpretation for disease- or trait-associated genetic variants in genome-wide association studies. Instead of expensive and time-consuming biological experiments, computational prediction of EPIs with DNA sequence and other genomic data is a fast and viable alternative. In particular, deep learning and other machine learning methods have been demonstrated with promising performance.

resultsFirst, using a published human cell line dataset, we demonstrate that a simple convolutional neural network (CNN) performs as well as, if no better than, a more complicated and state-of-the-art architecture, a hybrid of a CNN and a recurrent neural network. More importantly, in spite of the well-known cell line-specific EPIs (and corresponding gene expression), in contrast to the standard practice of training and predicting for each cell line separately, we propose two transfer learning approaches to training a model using all cell lines to various extents, leading to substantially improved predictive performance. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Computer code is available at https://github.com/zzUMN/Combine-CNN-Enhancer-and-Promoters. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidBase SequenceDNAHumansNeural Networks, ComputerDNA

Identifiers

PMID30649185
PMCPMC6735851
OpenAlexW2911079020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.