ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
MULTiPly: a novel multi-layer predictor for discovering general and specific types of promoters.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- PBP_ICBA: a prediction of bacterial promoters in specific organisms using an improved convolutional block attention module.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Characterization of archaeal promoters using explainable and web-based CNN model.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Computational Pipeline for Targeted Integration and Variable Payload Expression in Bacteriophage Engineering.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- iPro-MP: a BERT-based model to predict multiple prokaryotic promoters.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Enhancing nucleotide sequence representations in genomic analysis with contrastive optimization.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Predicting Promoters in Multiple Prokaryotes with Prompt.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- A two-task predictor for discovering phase separation proteins and their undergoing mechanism.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- iProL: identifying DNA promoters from sequence information based on Longformer pre-trained model.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- msBERT-Promoter: a multi-scale ensemble predictor based on BERT pre-trained model for the two-stage prediction of DNA promoters and their strengths.BMC biology · 2024Article
- iPro2L-DG: Hybrid network based on improved densenet and global attention mechanism for identifying promoter sequences.Heliyon · 2024Article
- BreCML: identifying breast cancer cell state in scRNA-seq via machine learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Nucleic Transformer: Classifying DNA Sequences with Self-Attention and Convolutions.ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- PromGER: Promoter Prediction Based on Graph Embedding and Ensemble Learning for Eukaryotic Sequence.Genes · 2023Article
- Computational methods for identifying enhancer-promoter interactions.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2023Review
- iProm-Sigma54: A CNN Base Prediction Tool forCells · 2023Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence as a reliable annotator of archaeal promoter regions.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- ProkBERT family: genomic language models for microbiome applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Golgi_DF: Golgi proteins classification with deep forest.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- csORF-finder: an effective ensemble learning framework for accurate identification of multi-species coding short open reading frames.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationPromoters are short DNA consensus sequences that are localized proximal to the transcription start sites of genes, allowing transcription initiation of particular genes. However, the precise prediction of promoters remains a challenging task because individual promoters often differ from the consensus at one or more positions.
resultsIn this study, we present a new multi-layer computational approach, called MULTiPly, for recognizing promoters and their specific types. MULTiPly took into account the sequences themselves, including both local information such as k-tuple nucleotide composition, dinucleotide-based auto covariance and global information of the entire samples based on bi-profile Bayes and k-nearest neighbour feature encodings. Specifically, the F-score feature selection method was applied to identify the best unique type of feature prediction results, in combination with other types of features that were subsequently added to further improve the prediction performance of MULTiPly. Benchmarking experiments on the benchmark dataset and comparisons with five state-of-the-art tools show that MULTiPly can achieve a better prediction performance on 5-fold cross-validation and jackknife tests. Moreover, the superiority of MULTiPly was also validated on a newly constructed independent test dataset. MULTiPly is expected to be used as a useful tool that will facilitate the discovery of both general and specific types of promoters in the post-genomic era. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The MULTiPly webserver and curated datasets are freely available at http://flagshipnt.erc.monash.edu/MULTiPly/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.