Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649171›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2020

ANPELA: analysis and performance assessment of the label-free quantification workflow for metaproteomic studies.

Jing Tang, Jianbo Fu, Yunxia Wang, Bo Li, Yinghong Li, Qingxia Yang, Xuejiao Cui, Jiajun Hong, Xiaofeng Li, Yuzong Chen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bioinformatic Workflows for Metaproteomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jing TangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jianbo FuCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yunxia WangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Bo LiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Yinghong LiCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qingxia YangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xuejiao CuiCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jiajun HongCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaofeng LiCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yuzong ChenBioinformatics and Drug Design Group, Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Weiwei XueSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Feng ZhuCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Label-free quantification (LFQ) with a specific and sequentially integrated workflow of acquisition technique, quantification tool and processing method has emerged as the popular technique employed in metaproteomic research to provide a comprehensive landscape of the adaptive response of microbes to external stimuli and their interactions with other organisms or host cells. The performance of a specific LFQ workflow is highly dependent on the studied data. Hence, it is essential to discover the most appropriate one for a specific data set. However, it is challenging to perform such discovery due to the large number of possible workflows and the multifaceted nature of the evaluation criteria. Herein, a web server ANPELA (https://idrblab.org/anpela/) was developed and validated as the first tool enabling performance assessment of whole LFQ workflow (collective assessment by five well-established criteria with distinct underlying theories), and it enabled the identification of the optimal LFQ workflow(s) by a comprehensive performance ranking. ANPELA not only automatically detects the diverse formats of data generated by all quantification tools but also provides the most complete set of processing methods among the available web servers and stand-alone tools. Systematic validation using metaproteomic benchmarks revealed ANPELA's capabilities in 1 discovering well-performing workflow(s), (2) enabling assessment from multiple perspectives and (3) validating LFQ accuracy using spiked proteins. ANPELA has a unique ability to evaluate the performance of whole LFQ workflow and enables the discovery of the optimal LFQs by the comprehensive performance ranking of all 560 workflows. Therefore, it has great potential for applications in metaproteomic and other studies requiring LFQ techniques, as many features are shared among proteomic studies.

Indexed as

WorkflowInternetProteinsProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsProteinslabel-free quantificationLFQ workflowmetaproteomicsmicrobiotaperformance assessment

Identifiers

PMID30649171
PMCPMC7299298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.