ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2020
Graph- and rule-based learning algorithms: a comprehensive review of their applications for cancer type classification and prognosis using genomic data.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- EIOFX-DT: Leveraging graph centrality metrics for feature extraction and classification of viral genetic sequences.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Multi-omics data integration for enhanced cancer subtyping via interactive multi-kernel learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- How to accelerate the inorganic materials synthesis: from computational guidelines to data-driven method?National science review · 2025Review
- Application of an Externally Developed Algorithm to Identify Research Cases and Controls from EHR Data: Trials and Triumphs.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Synergistic horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes and transposons in the infant gut microbial genome.mSphere · 2024Article
- Computational Methods Summarizing Mutational Patterns in Cancer: Promise and Limitations for Clinical Applications.Cancers · 2023Review
- Improved downstream functional analysis of single-cell RNA-sequence data using DGAN.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- 3PNMF-MKL: A non-negative matrix factorization-based multiple kernel learning method for multi-modal data integration and its application to gene signature detection.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Designing optimal convolutional neural network architecture using differential evolution algorithm.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Computational Analysis of High-Dimensional DNA Methylation Data for Cancer Prognosis.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022Review
- Review
- Comparison of five supervised feature selection algorithms leading to top features and gene signatures from multi-omics data in cancer.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- A Deep Learning-Based Framework for Supporting Clinical Diagnosis of Glioblastoma Subtypes.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Nextcast: A software suite to analyse and model toxicogenomics data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Accurate cancer phenotype prediction with AKLIMATE, a stacked kernel learner integrating multimodal genomic data and pathway knowledge.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Computational learning of features for automated colonic polyp classification.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- In silico ranking of phenolics for therapeutic effectiveness on cancer stem cells.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
- Identification of specific microRNA-messenger RNA regulation pairs in four subtypes of breast cancer.IET systems biology · 2020Article
- Multi-Objective Optimized Fuzzy Clustering for Detecting Cell Clusters from Single-Cell Expression Profiles.Genes · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is well recognized as a complex disease with dysregulated molecular networks or modules. Graph- and rule-based analytics have been applied extensively for cancer classification as well as prognosis using large genomic and other data over the past decade. This article provides a comprehensive review of various graph- and rule-based machine learning algorithms that have been applied to numerous genomics data to determine the cancer-specific gene modules, identify gene signature-based classifiers and carry out other related objectives of potential therapeutic value. This review focuses mainly on the methodological design and features of these algorithms to facilitate the application of these graph- and rule-based analytical approaches for cancer classification and prognosis. Based on the type of data integration, we divided all the algorithms into three categories: model-based integration, pre-processing integration and post-processing integration. Each category is further divided into four sub-categories (supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised and survival-driven learning analyses) based on learning style. Therefore, a total of 11 categories of methods are summarized with their inputs, objectives and description, advantages and potential limitations. Next, we briefly demonstrate well-known and most recently developed algorithms for each sub-category along with salient information, such as data profiles, statistical or feature selection methods and outputs. Finally, we summarize the appropriate use and efficiency of all categories of graph- and rule mining-based learning methods when input data and specific objective are given. This review aims to help readers to select and use the appropriate algorithms for cancer classification and prognosis study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.