Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30649167›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Catch-Up Growth in Full-Term Small for Gestational Age Infants: A Systematic Review.

Susan C Campisi, Sarah E Carbone, Stanley Zlotkin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Voting Restrictions and Increased Odds of Adverse Birth Outcomes in the US.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan C CampisiDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sarah E CarboneLawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Stanley ZlotkinDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the first systematic review to examine the global prevalence of catch-up growth (CUG) in small for gestational age (SGA) infants who were born at full term (FT). Size at birth and subsequent growth is an important indicator of neonatal and adult health. Globally, 16% of infants are SGA at birth, ranging from 7% in industrialized countries to 41.5% in South Asia. SGA infants are at increased risk for negative developmental and adult health outcomes. Some achieve CUG but others do not. CUG has immediate and late health implications especially in low- and middle-income countries. This systematic review sought to determine the global prevalence of CUG among FT-SGA infants. We performed a literature search of MEDLINE, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, as well as grey literature databases, and identified 3137 studies. The final analysis included 11 studies. The median prevalence of CUG was 87.4% across all definitions of SGA and CUG. However, multiple definitions were used to classify SGA and CUG. Nine unique reference populations were used to classify SGA, and 6 to approximate CUG. Due to this heterogeneity, a meta-analysis could not be conducted. Program implementation for this vulnerable group of infants is dependent on proper classification. Given the wide range of definitions and reference standards used in the past, it is not possible to determine the global need for programs to address CUG for FT-SGA infants or to rationally plan any such programs. We highlight the need and propose standard definitions and references for SGA and CUG.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMaleTerm Birth

Identifiers

PMID30649167
PMCPMC6370265
OpenAlexW2910882088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.